I wonder if they ever tried, tested or calculated this or if they discarded the idea of the HALO on conservative grounds. Good to see on the onboard when, among others, Ryan Hunter Ray was on full speed trough small debris without any problems. The aero screen is a solution for a problem that doesn't exist.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑20 Aug 2018, 12:46I think that indy's problem with the halo is the sight lines. In the banked corners, the driver is looking up as well as left and the halo potentially blocks his view. Keep in mind that at 200mph, the cars are doing nearly a football field per second so the drivers are looking a long way ahead. The halo would prevent that and make crashes even more likely.
Looking at the crash again, when he's in the air whirling around, and as he lands, the helmet is almost down below the cockpit sides. That does look like a neck injury waiting to happen.
Yeah that's probably the same pic I was looking at. It's when it hits the catch fencing and spins and the head is jerked around like a rag-doll, these modern helmets are not very heavy but under those accelerations it's a considerable load on the neck. I also wonder how the absorption of the headrest foam diminishes with multiple hits.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑20 Aug 2018, 22:12Looking at the crash again, when he's in the air whirling around, and as he lands, the helmet is almost down below the cockpit sides. That does look like a neck injury waiting to happen.
Great point, when I think about it, most of the really tragic accidents where a car has gone over the safer barrier would have not happened with a double high barrier. In the area where this occurred there was no visibility concern from outside the track so it may make more sense to start installing double highs in turns where there are no spectators, and where there are spectators evaluate what can be done.Zynerji wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 02:49Crazy accident. Could have definitely been fatal.
I grew up about 45 minutes from Pocono, and have seen many races there in my time. The fencing saved that man, as what lies beyond would have been far more catastrophic.
I'm not sure hockey style polycarbonate walls would have been better, but it seems a double height Safer Barrier might have been the best impact structure.
Yes, but then the spectators won't see anything...Zynerji wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 02:49Crazy accident. Could have definitely been fatal.
I grew up about 45 minutes from Pocono, and have seen many races there in my time. The fencing saved that man, as what lies beyond would have been far more catastrophic.
I'm not sure hockey style polycarbonate walls would have been better, but it seems a double height Safer Barrier might have been the best impact structure.
from the infield everyone would only have a view of parts of the track, outside they can see all the trackWaikeCU wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 10:46Yes, but then the spectators won't see anything...Zynerji wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 02:49Crazy accident. Could have definitely been fatal.
I grew up about 45 minutes from Pocono, and have seen many races there in my time. The fencing saved that man, as what lies beyond would have been far more catastrophic.
I'm not sure hockey style polycarbonate walls would have been better, but it seems a double height Safer Barrier might have been the best impact structure.
Unless you switch it the other way around. The stands are on the infield and the pitlane, paddock are on the outside?
On ovals (or tri-ovals like Pocono) you watch more across the track than the part closest to you. At least I did when I went to NASCAR races there in the early-mid 90s. Double height barriers in the corners wouldn't interfere IMHO.WaikeCU wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 10:46Yes, but then the spectators won't see anything...Zynerji wrote: ↑21 Aug 2018, 02:49Crazy accident. Could have definitely been fatal.
I grew up about 45 minutes from Pocono, and have seen many races there in my time. The fencing saved that man, as what lies beyond would have been far more catastrophic.
I'm not sure hockey style polycarbonate walls would have been better, but it seems a double height Safer Barrier might have been the best impact structure.
Unless you switch it the other way around. The stands are on the infield and the pitlane, paddock are on the outside?
Latest reported on motorsport is a thoracic fracture from compression and nerve injury - which suggests paraplegia is the prognosis. Could be the nerves are pinched by swelling around the break and function could recover with time. Depending on the severity of his leg breaks that could be tough to check and rehab. Hopefully he'll race again but it's looking less likely every day.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑20 Aug 2018, 22:12Looking at the crash again, when he's in the air whirling around, and as he lands, the helmet is almost down below the cockpit sides. That does look like a neck injury waiting to happen.