Who else were they going to sign?
Like last year when Hamilton gave a place back to Bottas in Hungary during Hamilton and Vettel's intense title fight (believe Vettel was leading when that happened, too)?Vanja #66 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2018, 20:30So, no discussion here about Mercedes hypocrisy about using Bottas as a support driver?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... a/3166685/
Like it hasn't been going on from Spain last year...
Yeah, whatever.
Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrarizibby43 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2018, 23:16Like last year when Hamilton gave a place back to Bottas in Hungary during Hamilton and Vettel's intense title fight (believe Vettel was leading when that happened, too)?Vanja #66 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2018, 20:30So, no discussion here about Mercedes hypocrisy about using Bottas as a support driver?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... a/3166685/
Like it hasn't been going on from Spain last year...
Thank you. To make the example even more striking . . .siskue2005 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:37Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrarizibby43 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2018, 23:16Like last year when Hamilton gave a place back to Bottas in Hungary during Hamilton and Vettel's intense title fight (believe Vettel was leading when that happened, too)?Vanja #66 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2018, 20:30So, no discussion here about Mercedes hypocrisy about using Bottas as a support driver?
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... a/3166685/
Like it hasn't been going on from Spain last year...
You guys are still arguing about what Ferrari does to Kimi? Isn't it obvious since the past few years? Ferrari never said that Kimi will have equal chances as Vettel, and been using him for last few years. Meanwhile, Mercedes has been going on an on about their driver parity and stuff, while using Bottas as a no. 2. There is a difference.zibby43 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:55Thank you. To make the example even more striking . . .siskue2005 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:37Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrari
In that same race in Hungary last year, Vettel was a wounded duck with a steering problem and despite that fact, they sat Kimi behind Vettel as a roadblock, allowing Hamilton the chance to make an attack with his superior pace.
Kimi finished a mere 9 tenths behind Vettel. He should've been allowed to pass the stricken Vettel (steering problem), but Ferrari was playing him for the wingman he has always been, and will always be.
Also this year at Hungary when bottas went into Vettel, Kimi could have easily passed Vettel but lifted off to keep Vettel ahead.zibby43 wrote:Thank you. To make the example even more striking . . .siskue2005 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:37Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrari
In that same race in Hungary last year, Vettel was a wounded duck with a steering problem and despite that fact, they sat Kimi behind Vettel as a roadblock, allowing Hamilton the chance to make an attack with his superior pace.
Kimi finished a mere 9 tenths behind Vettel. He should've been allowed to pass the stricken Vettel (steering problem), but Ferrari was playing him for the wingman he has always been, and will always be.
Kimi is much slower than Vettel it's just that. He has a race or two in season when he is a little faster and that's it.GrayGreat wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 09:21You guys are still arguing about what Ferrari does to Kimi? Isn't it obvious since the past few years? Ferrari never said that Kimi will have equal chances as Vettel, and been using him for last few years. Meanwhile, Mercedes has been going on an on about their driver parity and stuff, while using Bottas as a no. 2. There is a difference.zibby43 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:55Thank you. To make the example even more striking . . .siskue2005 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:37
Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrari
In that same race in Hungary last year, Vettel was a wounded duck with a steering problem and despite that fact, they sat Kimi behind Vettel as a roadblock, allowing Hamilton the chance to make an attack with his superior pace.
Kimi finished a mere 9 tenths behind Vettel. He should've been allowed to pass the stricken Vettel (steering problem), but Ferrari was playing him for the wingman he has always been, and will always be.
You just can't compare Vettel-Kimi to Hamilton-Bottas. Ferrari situation is obvious. They will use Kimi to protect Vettel, and won't repeat like a broken record that both their drivers are equal, unlike Mercedes.
Vettel was on more fresh and softer tyres. Kimi wouldn't have chance to overtake him, especially not on a track like Hungaroring. Bottas was holding Vettel back and then on purpose crash into him. If that was reverse situation Vettel would receive a big penalty for that. But everything was quite even after more stupid crash with Ricciardo. He should receive a black flag after that. But that's another topic.Justthatek wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 09:45Also this year at Hungary when bottas went into Vettel, Kimi could have easily passed Vettel but lifted off to keep Vettel ahead.zibby43 wrote:Thank you. To make the example even more striking . . .siskue2005 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 08:37
Good example of fair play from Merc team.....which sadly we cannot expect from Ferrari
In that same race in Hungary last year, Vettel was a wounded duck with a steering problem and despite that fact, they sat Kimi behind Vettel as a roadblock, allowing Hamilton the chance to make an attack with his superior pace.
Kimi finished a mere 9 tenths behind Vettel. He should've been allowed to pass the stricken Vettel (steering problem), but Ferrari was playing him for the wingman he has always been, and will always be.
Yeah, no, that was Ham's fair play, Toto was pissed because of that. I don't mind team orders, this is team sport, but I mind Mercedes' management hypocrisy about it. Ferrari has a problem of their Finn being too slow too often - and when he is fast enough he mucks up qualy.
Not at all. Toto was the one who wanted the swap to happen. It was Niki who wanted Hamilton to keep the position. You can read Toto's q&a on this on f1's official site, hear him say it in the post race interviews, etc.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2018, 10:25Yeah, no, that was Ham's fair play, Toto was pissed because of that. I don't mind team orders, this is team sport, but I mind Mercedes' management hypocrisy about it. Ferrari has a problem of their Finn being too slow too often - and when he is fast enough he mucks up qualy.