Lewis Hamilton took the victory at Monza during the 69th Italian Grand Prix after he collided with his title rival Sebastian Vettel on the first lap. The Briton extended his lead in the championship to 32 points.
Once on the lap Rai pitted, then both laps after...foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:44
They did it twice. I dont think they were "fake". They just wanted do go for the opposite strategy for the 1st one. For the 2nd one they would have entered if the times by Hamilton were worse than Rai on softs, they weren't.
Kimi no longer willing to play that role if his job is done at Ferrariapexcontrol wrote:WINGMAN bottas to the rescue wahahaha, ......it's unbelievble never seen 2 champions that are so bad, if ferrari is smart they will do the same and let kimi kill hamilton a few times
you cant make this up ......bottas literary said yes ..... needed to block kimi. .....what a damn idiots
Why? For some cheers?Spoutnik wrote:Hamilton need to finish his career at Ferrari
You don't understand, they will discuss his support role AFTER the race
. I almost expected Ferrari to pit Rai on lap 51 for "safety" reasons, and move Seb to 3rd.NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:47The thing about Kimi wrecking his tyres was, if he didnt push hard at the start of the stint, Hamilton had the pace to over cut him. Kimi had to push that hard to make sure he stayed in front.
Was it?? maybe. I still think the intention was not foul. They were just monitoring the times. they didn't know whether to pit or not...Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:45Once on the lap Rai pitted, then both laps after...foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:44
They did it twice. I dont think they were "fake". They just wanted do go for the opposite strategy for the 1st one. For the 2nd one they would have entered if the times by Hamilton were worse than Rai on softs, they weren't.
3 times
Then why have a rule at all?foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:49Was it?? maybe. I still think the intention was not foul. They were just monitoring the times. they didn't know whether to pit or not...Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:45Once on the lap Rai pitted, then both laps after...foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:44
They did it twice. I dont think they were "fake". They just wanted do go for the opposite strategy for the 1st one. For the 2nd one they would have entered if the times by Hamilton were worse than Rai on softs, they weren't.
3 times
Mercedes is willing to use Bottas to delay the competition, Ferrari doesn't even change the running order to benefit their number 1.
Why? He got the best result that was possible for him today. Clearly he was struggling this weekend, but he still got the max from his position.langedweil wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:49Probably gonna be flamed for it, but I’d say that rewarding Bottas’s non-racing capabilities is exactly what is wrong nowadays .. an operator instead of a racer.
Rule is okay with what Merc did today man...Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:51Then why have a rule at all?foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:49Was it?? maybe. I still think the intention was not foul. They were just monitoring the times. they didn't know whether to pit or not...
