Fulcrum wrote: ↑07 Oct 2018, 09:02
While it may have eclipsed Renault in the peak power stakes, I think the Honda is still the worst in "sustained power" engine mode. The Renault has poor peak power production, but good recovery, while Ferrari and Mercedes are in a another league altogether.
The other issue is the integration of the PU and chassis. I don't think Toro Rosso have ever got on top of this, so their tyre wear has usually been higher than average. This is not helped by the drivability of the Honda engine, which likely contributes to excessive tyre wear.
Where's this come from? It's actually been noted in a lot of previous races the STR is actually light on its tyres, it's not a known trait that it eats tyres. Gasly lost his tyres at the end, likely from pushing too hard, too quickly after the pitstop. He smashed passed the Saubers and set a fastest sector time.
I don't think the result has anything to do with the PU. If anything, that kept them higher than usual. Neither does the Honda have poor driveability?? That's baseless. Both drivers have said it's quite easy to drive and an improvement over the 2017 Renault.
What happened here is a direct result from a large gap since the last chassis update on the car and an awful pit strategy..
It's been far far too long, hopefully next race in Austin, they have a decent chassis upgrade on hand so they can move the entire package forward and their strategists have been given a stern wake up call.