Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

On the missed apex broadcast, they are talking about that a button has gone missing on the Ferrari steering wheel since two races. Is this true? It's the first I've heard it being mentioned.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula
46
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 13:23

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

djones wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 10:27
Maybe its just as simple as they had the ability to run both batteries in series on demand.

If they put the original sensor one of the batteries, then it would only ever show the voltage/output from that one. Presumably they now have a sensor on both batteries and they add it together and divide by two to see if they were breaking the rules.
I wrote that before but...What Ferrari is using is simply 2 piles of battery cells. It's no problem at all to connect both piles to a single output connector so you can see the whole energy flow with only one sensor. Which cells are in use at which time is purely managed by software. Just putting the cells into two smaller piles instead of one big one doesn't tell us anything about how they are used and i don't understand why some people think this could circumvent the rules. It's not 1 battery against 2 batteries. It's several hundred cells in one pile against several hundred cells in two piles.

And anyway i don't understand why everyone is lamenting over this minor difference in batterydesing. Because even if Ferrari would cheat in this area, the more intresting question should be where they get the energy from to do this in the first place. Because the ES is only a temporary energy buffer, it doesn't create any energy which means Ferrari would have found a way to recover more electric energy than everybody else apparently.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Dr. Acula wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:17
djones wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 10:27
Maybe its just as simple as they had the ability to run both batteries in series on demand.

If they put the original sensor one of the batteries, then it would only ever show the voltage/output from that one. Presumably they now have a sensor on both batteries and they add it together and divide by two to see if they were breaking the rules.
I wrote that before but...What Ferrari is using is simply 2 piles of battery cells. It's no problem at all to connect both piles to a single output connector so you can see the whole energy flow with only one sensor. Which cells are in use at which time is purely managed by software. Just putting the cells into two smaller piles instead of one big one doesn't tell us anything about how they are used and i don't understand why some people think this could circumvent the rules. It's not 1 battery against 2 batteries. It's several hundred cells in one pile against several hundred cells in two piles.

And anyway i don't understand why everyone is lamenting over this minor difference in batterydesing. Because even if Ferrari would cheat in this area, the more intresting question should be where they get the energy from to do this in the first place. Because the ES is only a temporary energy buffer, it doesn't create any energy which means Ferrari would have found a way to recover more electric energy than everybody else apparently.
Exactly. We are dealing with a huge lot of battery cells, not a case of "1 battery vs 2 batteries". Each cell can be controlled individually. This is all very, very complex because you are dealing with cells charging, with cell decharging, with active cells, with spare capacity cells, etc.

... Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Maybe heat management?
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:43
Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
Yes, cells can be optimized.

It's not a great area of expertise for mine, but i can give you a very common example.

Panasonic sells Ni-MH batteries under its Eneloop brand (common in photography and videography circles), and has 2 main models.

Regular: 1900mAh capacity, 2100 charging cycles.
Pro: 2550mAh capacity, only 500 charging cycles.


I was taught pretty much all the major rechargeable technologies have a design/performance triangle. The 3 corners are charge/discharge rate, capacity, charging cycles (life expectancy). A design can be optimized to maximize one or two parameters, at the cause of the other.

I mentioned this maybe a month ago, but i think this is the reasoning for the 2 separate packs. The MGU-K, and MGU-H are two completely different animals, and thus would benefit from different cell optimizations.
201 105 104 9 9 7

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

dans79 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:25
turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:43
Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
Yes, cells can be optimized.

It's not a great area of expertise for mine, but i can give you a very common example.

Panasonic sells Ni-MH batteries under its Eneloop brand (common in photography and videography circles), and has 2 main models.

Regular: 1900mAh capacity, 2100 charging cycles.
Pro: 2550mAh capacity, only 500 charging cycles.


I was taught pretty much all the major rechargeable technologies have a design/performance triangle. The 3 corners are charge/discharge rate, capacity, charging cycles (life expectancy). A design can be optimized to maximize one or two parameters, at the cause of the other.

I mentioned this maybe a month ago, but i think this is the reasoning for the 2 separate packs. The MGU-K, and MGU-H are two completely different animals, and thus would benefit from different cell optimizations.
And are we sure these are two separate physical packs, or are they just a bunch of dynamically allocated cells. As well as having installed spares for cell failures along the way, would there be any benefit/loss by being able to have changing voltages for different strategies or subsystems (ie. charge/discharge rates, motor efficiency, generator efficiency, temperature management, etc)? I'm thinking that running the H<>ES and the K<>ES as two separate subsystems, with different operating conditions, may be advantageous.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

dans79 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:25
turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:43
Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
Yes, cells can be optimized.

It's not a great area of expertise for mine, but i can give you a very common example.

Panasonic sells Ni-MH batteries under its Eneloop brand (common in photography and videography circles), and has 2 main models.

Regular: 1900mAh capacity, 2100 charging cycles.
Pro: 2550mAh capacity, only 500 charging cycles.


I was taught pretty much all the major rechargeable technologies have a design/performance triangle. The 3 corners are charge/discharge rate, capacity, charging cycles (life expectancy). A design can be optimized to maximize one or two parameters, at the cause of the other.

I mentioned this maybe a month ago, but i think this is the reasoning for the 2 separate packs. The MGU-K, and MGU-H are two completely different animals, and thus would benefit from different cell optimizations.
Interesting. You could than still optimize their positioning for optimal cooling in the battery packaging. So instead of separate, they are together, but with a specific pattern for weight, heat, volume, etc. Since the cells are all driven individually anyway through the control unit, it really does not matter how they are aranged from a perspective of receiving and delivering from and to their respective mgu. Should that be the case; we don't know for sure if they use different cells. They could just as well use the same type of extremely high performance cell. I'm far from being an expert myself.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:41
dans79 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:25
turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:43
Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
Yes, cells can be optimized.

It's not a great area of expertise for mine, but i can give you a very common example.

Panasonic sells Ni-MH batteries under its Eneloop brand (common in photography and videography circles), and has 2 main models.

Regular: 1900mAh capacity, 2100 charging cycles.
Pro: 2550mAh capacity, only 500 charging cycles.


I was taught pretty much all the major rechargeable technologies have a design/performance triangle. The 3 corners are charge/discharge rate, capacity, charging cycles (life expectancy). A design can be optimized to maximize one or two parameters, at the cause of the other.

I mentioned this maybe a month ago, but i think this is the reasoning for the 2 separate packs. The MGU-K, and MGU-H are two completely different animals, and thus would benefit from different cell optimizations.
Interesting. You could than still optimize their positioning for optimal cooling in the battery packaging. So instead of separate, they are together, but with a specific pattern for weight, heat, volume, etc. Since the cells are all driven individually anyway through the control unit, it really does not matter how they are aranged from a perspective of receiving and delivering from and to their respective mgu. Should that be the case; we don't know for sure if they use different cells. They could just as well use the same type of extremely high performance cell. I'm far from being an expert myself.
My assumption, is that the optimization is for charge/discharge rate, and cycles.

The MGU-K is recovering energy in big gulps at discrete points during a lap (Breaking zones). MGU-H can be recovering energy almost continuously, but at a lower rate.
201 105 104 9 9 7

Kevinkirk
Kevinkirk
0
Joined: 30 Apr 2018, 21:48

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Is the best reason to have 2 battery packs that you could discharge one pack while charging the other. I know it's possible to quickly swap from charge to discharge at very high frequency but surely it's better not to.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Kevinkirk wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 16:59
Is the best reason to have 2 battery packs that you could discharge one pack while charging the other. I know it's possible to quickly swap from charge to discharge at very high frequency but surely it's better not to.
This makes sense. What would be the situation which requires charging and discharging at the same time? Deploying K while using H to charge? Would that explain medium speed acceleration surges?

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Where does the required second (Ferrari only) sensor fit into the above discussion?

Brian

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1036
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Phil wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 12:58
On the missed apex broadcast, they are talking about that a button has gone missing on the Ferrari steering wheel since two races. Is this true? It's the first I've heard it being mentioned.
Maybe they were talking about the mysterious button under the silicon on the steering wheel that the drivers use at the start? I recently saw a photo posted here of it missing on one of the steering wheels. Gonna check some onboards to see if they're still using it.
Edit:
Judging from the onboards it's still there. Also they use it on the start of the formation lap and on race start so is it even a performance thing?

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 19:01
Phil wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 12:58
On the missed apex broadcast, they are talking about that a button has gone missing on the Ferrari steering wheel since two races. Is this true? It's the first I've heard it being mentioned.
Maybe they were talking about the mysterious button under the silicon on the steering wheel that the drivers use at the start? I recently saw a photo posted here of it missing on one of the steering wheels. Gonna check some onboards to see if they're still using it.
Edit:
Judging from the onboards it's still there. Also they use it on the start of the formation lap and on race start so is it even a performance thing?
I don't think they need more performance at the start. Don't they already have more than enough power on hand to remain traction limited to >100kph? By getting more engine performance wouldn't that just make it even harder to control (for example, it would be easier to modulate 75% of available engine power vs. 100% of available engine power)? I could see the reasoning of having a more consistent power output vs slamming 1000hp to the clutch and having to modulate that power delivery from a dead stop.

Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula
46
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 13:23

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 19:01
Phil wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 12:58
On the missed apex broadcast, they are talking about that a button has gone missing on the Ferrari steering wheel since two races. Is this true? It's the first I've heard it being mentioned.
Maybe they were talking about the mysterious button under the silicon on the steering wheel that the drivers use at the start? I recently saw a photo posted here of it missing on one of the steering wheels. Gonna check some onboards to see if they're still using it.
Edit:
Judging from the onboards it's still there. Also they use it on the start of the formation lap and on race start so is it even a performance thing?
Well, it can't have to do much with the ERS because the rules say that they can't use the MGU-K at the start until they reached 100kph.
The button is probably just a special rev limiter for the start.

Brake Horse Power
Brake Horse Power
18
Joined: 25 Oct 2017, 21:36

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:41
dans79 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 14:25
turbof1 wrote:
08 Oct 2018, 13:43
Now to think of it, is there any way to optimise battery cells for the MGU-K and MGU-H respectively? Can the source of the energy have an impact on the design, structure, chemical makeup, etc of a battery cell?
Yes, cells can be optimized.

It's not a great area of expertise for mine, but i can give you a very common example.

Panasonic sells Ni-MH batteries under its Eneloop brand (common in photography and videography circles), and has 2 main models.

Regular: 1900mAh capacity, 2100 charging cycles.
Pro: 2550mAh capacity, only 500 charging cycles.


I was taught pretty much all the major rechargeable technologies have a design/performance triangle. The 3 corners are charge/discharge rate, capacity, charging cycles (life expectancy). A design can be optimized to maximize one or two parameters, at the cause of the other.

I mentioned this maybe a month ago, but i think this is the reasoning for the 2 separate packs. The MGU-K, and MGU-H are two completely different animals, and thus would benefit from different cell optimizations.
Interesting. You could than still optimize their positioning for optimal cooling in the battery packaging. So instead of separate, they are together, but with a specific pattern for weight, heat, volume, etc. Since the cells are all driven individually anyway through the control unit, it really does not matter how they are aranged from a perspective of receiving and delivering from and to their respective mgu. Should that be the case; we don't know for sure if they use different cells. They could just as well use the same type of extremely high performance cell. I'm far from being an expert myself.
Is it known what kind of batteries they use, and are it even batteries? Supercapacitors would function far better and have a superb efficiency..