Yep, most drivers with long careers would be on it no doubt
Well done but not exactly relevant for F1 as it still doesn't change the fact that no one woman has come in the top 3 in a season of f3 (gp3) or f2 (gp2)hollus wrote: ↑10 Oct 2018, 23:12I'll just leave this here:
http://www.worldsbk.com/en/news/2018/Ri ... 0+Champion
First female world champion crowned at Magny-Cours
At just 21 years of age, Ana Carrasco (DS Junior Team) has made history in the FIM Supersport 300 World Championship as she secured the world title in the final race of the season at Circuit de Nevers Magny-Cours. Becoming the first female to secure a world title, her performance this season has been nothing short of stunning, and it will be one that won’t be forgotten in a while...
Yeah, reminds me of the womens tennis, when they were complaining about the prize money not being as big as the mens tennis at the same events. I'd guess only playing 2/3 sets in a final instead of 3/5 being part of it.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 05:45I can't wait until the feminists start complaining "Female drivers get paid far less than male drivers to do the same job" while completely disregarding viewership and sponsorship numbers.
In tennis the match is a bit shorter indeed. But it's very hard to find a sport, industry, job, etc, where woman earn at least the same as men. Of course there are exceptions but in general the pay gap is very real. And yes, women have babies, work part time, etc etc. But even the ones that don't and building their careers on the same terms as their male counterparts, earn less.NathanOlder wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 09:06Yeah, reminds me of the womens tennis, when they were complaining about the prize money not being as big as the mens tennis at the same events. I'd guess only playing 2/3 sets in a final instead of 3/5 being part of it.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 05:45I can't wait until the feminists start complaining "Female drivers get paid far less than male drivers to do the same job" while completely disregarding viewership and sponsorship numbers.
Modelling.Jolle wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 10:03In tennis the match is a bit shorter indeed. But it's very hard to find a sport, industry, job, etc, where woman earn at least the same as men. Of course there are exceptions but in general the pay gap is very real. And yes, women have babies, work part time, etc etc. But even the ones that don't and building their careers on the same terms as their male counterparts, earn less.NathanOlder wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 09:06Yeah, reminds me of the womens tennis, when they were complaining about the prize money not being as big as the mens tennis at the same events. I'd guess only playing 2/3 sets in a final instead of 3/5 being part of it.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 05:45I can't wait until the feminists start complaining "Female drivers get paid far less than male drivers to do the same job" while completely disregarding viewership and sponsorship numbers.
Years ago I worked for a bureau who (also) did studies in this field. As a test I took a female dominated industry, childcare. Female directors, female HR staff, 90% female staf: and still, the men, doing the same work as the women, same education, same hours, same everything, earned about 15% more on average then the women.
testosterone isn't only about strength it is also promotes being aggressive and risk-takingnotsofast wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 00:42I wonder if the situation is similar to science education. Girls and boys participate (and perform) more or less equally at a young age. At a certain age, this changes, for reasons that are still being researched. That age is not 18. It's more like 10 or 12. That's why I'm thinking that targeting 18-year-olds is not the correct approach. Some of the girls with talent will have already moved on to other things.
Jordan Peterson explains the 'pay gap' really well. There's no denying that there is a bit of male privilege, but also women are way more agreeable, they tend to choose their professions based on what they like, as opposed to men, who tend to choose careers they like less but pay more, and a few other factors.Jolle wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 10:03In tennis the match is a bit shorter indeed. But it's very hard to find a sport, industry, job, etc, where woman earn at least the same as men. Of course there are exceptions but in general the pay gap is very real. And yes, women have babies, work part time, etc etc. But even the ones that don't and building their careers on the same terms as their male counterparts, earn less.NathanOlder wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 09:06Yeah, reminds me of the womens tennis, when they were complaining about the prize money not being as big as the mens tennis at the same events. I'd guess only playing 2/3 sets in a final instead of 3/5 being part of it.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑11 Oct 2018, 05:45I can't wait until the feminists start complaining "Female drivers get paid far less than male drivers to do the same job" while completely disregarding viewership and sponsorship numbers.
Years ago I worked for a bureau who (also) did studies in this field. As a test I took a female dominated industry, childcare. Female directors, female HR staff, 90% female staf: and still, the men, doing the same work as the women, same education, same hours, same everything, earned about 15% more on average then the women.