strad wrote: ↑09 Nov 2018, 19:36
this topic is closed as far as I'm concerned. When one of you are so closed minded as to down vote me for posting what happened with Boeing which Boeing admitted was a fault in their systems there is obviously no sense in trying to have an open minded, unprejudiced discussion.
I'm thinking you must have your whole 401K invested in A/Vs.
I downvoted that message, but removed it few minutes later, so you´re too late in your tantrum
I did downvote because you´re using plane automatisms to bash AVs, when they´re completely different. 3d vs 2d. A vehicle wich can´t go below certain airspeed (and airspeed can vary drastically and unexpectedly due to wind gusts and some other atmospheric phenomenon I don´t know the name in english) vs a vehicle wich can hit the brakes at any moment. Apples to oranges.
Anycase I regret a bit later as I don´t think that really deserve a downvote even if I think that´s not a fair comparison, so removed it
But I´m still waiting for you reply about the video I linked. If some accident caused by
AI(notice the italics) in planes is enough for you to bash AVs, what about that video with dozens of accidents caused by humans wich have no excuse because just looking at the road would have been enough to prevent it?