Ahh, OK mate, thanksMtthsMlw wrote: ↑15 Nov 2018, 19:39No that was at the t-tray section.Webber2011 wrote: ↑15 Nov 2018, 19:04Isn't this radius the exact part of the car that haas had problems with ?
Ahh, OK mate, thanksMtthsMlw wrote: ↑15 Nov 2018, 19:39No that was at the t-tray section.Webber2011 wrote: ↑15 Nov 2018, 19:04Isn't this radius the exact part of the car that haas had problems with ?
Pretty sure that’s the RB8 with the Coanda exhaust and ramp. Might be wrong though.CLKGTR wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 12:02Sorry for posting this in RB14 thread, but I didn't find RB7 thread...
Red Bull RB7 rear end from Zandvoort demo in super hi res (6058 x 3791 px, open in a new tab)
Exhausts are modified to improve cooling and reliability I guess... no pipes in the floor as on original RB7. They run it in that configuration for all demo runs.
https://maxf1.net/wp-content/uploads/20 ... d-Bull.jpg
Would seem so. Still, great picture, so thank you for that!Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 12:54Pretty sure that’s the RB8 with the Coanda exhaust and ramp. Might be wrong though.CLKGTR wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 12:02Sorry for posting this in RB14 thread, but I didn't find RB7 thread...
Red Bull RB7 rear end from Zandvoort demo in super hi res (6058 x 3791 px, open in a new tab)
Exhausts are modified to improve cooling and reliability I guess... no pipes in the floor as on original RB7. They run it in that configuration for all demo runs.
https://maxf1.net/wp-content/uploads/20 ... d-Bull.jpg
Quote hard at this time of the year
I think the same is the case for every other team. No one comes to the first race fully understanding the car.bill shoe wrote: ↑21 Nov 2018, 00:19RB always seems to come on stronger in the second half of the season despite little in the way of clear visible changes.
Sauber recently said they had very few chassis updates during the season, and their greatly improved pace during 2018 was all down to setup improvements, especially starting after the 3rd race of the season. Maybe same as RB?
AMuS posted an article today but I can't seem to find it anymore about the RB14 diffuser. Horner stated that their diffuser did not work optimal until the end of the summer. They discovered that there was a correlation issue with it and after the fix the car behaved perfectly, at the same time they were taking grid penalties for new components.dxpetrov wrote: ↑21 Nov 2018, 12:20Nobody noticed, but to me big break through happened in Suzuka, where they discovered that they were faster on higher downforce setup, despite previous simulations which showed medium DF to be better. Since then they relatively kept the highest possible DF levels, which is basically their optimum setup, and that helped massively to watch after rubber and be possibly the fastest team in the race, on the expense of slightly slower quali pace.
I figured it would take them a while to get the most out of the curved diffuser, ultimately it has more potential than what they started the year with, they just had to tweak it for it to work correctly and that took a while.Godius wrote: ↑22 Nov 2018, 18:57AMuS posted an article today but I can't seem to find it anymore about the RB14 diffuser. Horner stated that their diffuser did not work optimal until the end of the summer. They discovered that there was a correlation issue with it and after the fix the car behaved perfectly, at the same time they were taking grid penalties for new components.dxpetrov wrote: ↑21 Nov 2018, 12:20Nobody noticed, but to me big break through happened in Suzuka, where they discovered that they were faster on higher downforce setup, despite previous simulations which showed medium DF to be better. Since then they relatively kept the highest possible DF levels, which is basically their optimum setup, and that helped massively to watch after rubber and be possibly the fastest team in the race, on the expense of slightly slower quali pace.