This is a concept by the way (made by me)
Well that explains a lot. Guess I'll go delete my post then. Although I wouldn't be surprised to see an air box like thatcharliesmithhd wrote: ↑16 Jan 2019, 23:56This is a concept by the way (made by me)
I thought it was a sneak peak at the real carcharliesmithhd wrote: ↑16 Jan 2019, 23:56This is a concept by the way (made by me)
Alrighty then... glad you have a sense of perspective!godlameroso wrote: ↑15 Jan 2019, 17:44Whatever helps you sleep at nightmwillems wrote: ↑15 Jan 2019, 15:34hahahahagodlameroso wrote: ↑08 Jan 2019, 02:29
What piece of bodywork is between the front wheels and the sidepods, answer, bargeboards, exactly what I've been saying since MARCH of 2018. I even made a thread in the aero section.
Listen, you were as wrong as you were right. Plenty of people, myself included, were arguing since June that this was a chassis problem that was causing the Aero to be so rubbish. So we were also correct. As correct as you in fact.....!
You said Bageboard area (Correct) and aero fix (Wrong, would never work).
We said Chassis problem (Correct) and wherever else (Wrong).
For me I'm not that technical, but it was clear from the information coming from different places within Mclaren that this was not a straight forward aero issue and was related to correlation that was not replicated in the wind tunnel. In fact there is a post somewhere where I state specifically that this issue appears to be due to on track behaviour of the car that caused the aero to degrade in performance, and I said that fairly early. But I guessed this to be suspension, from the information around. Someone suggested pitch and yaw, others said rear suspension (me).
Perhaps a bit more open mindedness from all sides would have merged those two notions together of BB and chassis and worked out the flaw.
I think a McLaren fan page used my image (without consent) and some people thought that the fan page was the official page :/NathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:01Reading in various places now that the photo being discussed here was uploaded as the background of Mclarens Official Facebook page. And that it could have given away that Coca Cola have sponsored Mclaren.
So now you are just covering your tracks and you work for Mclaren and you made a boo boocharliesmithhd wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:03I think a McLaren fan page used my image (without consent) and some people thought that the fan page was the official page :/NathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:01Reading in various places now that the photo being discussed here was uploaded as the background of Mclarens Official Facebook page. And that it could have given away that Coca Cola have sponsored Mclaren.
I wish I worked for them lol, here is the model I used https://www.artstation.com/artwork/roJqaNathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:06So now you are just covering your tracks and you work for Mclaren and you made a boo boocharliesmithhd wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:03I think a McLaren fan page used my image (without consent) and some people thought that the fan page was the official page :/NathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:01Reading in various places now that the photo being discussed here was uploaded as the background of Mclarens Official Facebook page. And that it could have given away that Coca Cola have sponsored Mclaren.
Coca Cola Mclaren Renault. Sounds good, Thanks.
gonna do another one, but side on this timeNathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:12Going a fair way to throw me off. We will see... if coca cola is on the rear wing. Then we will know if your telling porkies.
Ok. This time put Pepsi on it to counter the Coca Cola argument.charliesmithhd wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:13gonna do another one, but side on this timeNathanOlder wrote: ↑17 Jan 2019, 15:12Going a fair way to throw me off. We will see... if coca cola is on the rear wing. Then we will know if your telling porkies.