I await the soap opera of this. get the nibbles and tinnies in
(edited, I don't like popcorn)
Here is the definition of 1.4 BodyworkBodywork as defined in Article 1.4 of the F1 Technical Regulations and regulated by Article 3 of the F1 Technical Regulations with the exception of airboxes, engine exhausts and any prescribed bodywork geometries
So teams cannot directly use the same aero parts as a competitor or aquire the drawings and diagrams either.1.4 Bodywork :
All entirely sprung parts of the car in contact with the external air stream, except cameras, camera housings, rear view mirrors as defined in Article 14.3, ERS status lights, the secondary roll structure and associated fixings and fairings and the parts definitely associated with the mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission and running gear. Airboxes, radiators and engine exhausts are considered to be part of the bodywork
I bet it could become a real tin of worms debating what is 'different' and 'same'nevill3 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2019, 23:18So my current understanding is that teams can use...Quite restrictive really so Torro Rosso will have to design their own Tub, crash structures and aero panels/parts. The main advantage they could have would be to have "hands on" access to old Red Bull parts instead of relying on photography to measure and interpret desirable aero ideas.
- the same gearbox and engine as a competitor
The front and rear suspension and its associated mounts
and not much else, maybe wheels, hubs and brakes including the brake cooling solutions (They are not part of the sprung weight)
of course TR will use old designs (parts) from a RB14 with minor changes, or at least try it, which won't effect the car in anyway, but enough to say "see, we made our own design"Big Tea wrote: ↑22 Jan 2019, 23:38I bet it could become a real tin of worms debating what is 'different' and 'same'nevill3 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2019, 23:18So my current understanding is that teams can use...Quite restrictive really so Torro Rosso will have to design their own Tub, crash structures and aero panels/parts. The main advantage they could have would be to have "hands on" access to old Red Bull parts instead of relying on photography to measure and interpret desirable aero ideas.
- the same gearbox and engine as a competitor
The front and rear suspension and its associated mounts
and not much else, maybe wheels, hubs and brakes including the brake cooling solutions (They are not part of the sprung weight)
Nah, they look the same BUT this one has 3 slots in it the other has 2 (etc.)
'as with haas'?Ground Effect wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 11:29One thing is for sure, as we saw with Haas, we'll very likely see a reasonably big jump in performance with Toro Rosso under this new arrangement.
I think he was talking about Haas beinhg 8th and then 8th, then with a 'ferrari replica' jumping to 5th and scoring more points than the previous 2 years combined.Manoah2u wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 15:46'as with haas'?Ground Effect wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 11:29One thing is for sure, as we saw with Haas, we'll very likely see a reasonably big jump in performance with Toro Rosso under this new arrangement.
what on earth are you talking about.
Haas started from scratch in their arrangement, so there never has been any 'big jump' in regards. Haas was not HRT or Manor or anything like that, they did this from scratch.
Thanks, that's actually what I was referring to.NathanOlder wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 18:28I think he was talking about Haas beinhg 8th and then 8th, then with a 'ferrari replica' jumping to 5th and scoring more points than the previous 2 years combined.Manoah2u wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 15:46'as with haas'?Ground Effect wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 11:29One thing is for sure, as we saw with Haas, we'll very likely see a reasonably big jump in performance with Toro Rosso under this new arrangement.
what on earth are you talking about.
Haas started from scratch in their arrangement, so there never has been any 'big jump' in regards. Haas was not HRT or Manor or anything like that, they did this from scratch.
Toro Rosso could be about to do the same thing with a potential RB14 replica.
In reality, it's not 5th, it's 6th. If not for the Force India points situation. Haas was behind Williams and STR in 2017. We know how much Williams regressed and how STR's new partnership with Honda started.NathanOlder wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 18:28I think he was talking about Haas beinhg 8th and then 8th, then with a 'ferrari replica' jumping to 5th and scoring more points than the previous 2 years combined.Manoah2u wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 15:46'as with haas'?Ground Effect wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 11:29One thing is for sure, as we saw with Haas, we'll very likely see a reasonably big jump in performance with Toro Rosso under this new arrangement.
what on earth are you talking about.
Haas started from scratch in their arrangement, so there never has been any 'big jump' in regards. Haas was not HRT or Manor or anything like that, they did this from scratch.
I am not arguing the increase in performance, but providing a perspective of their finishing position.NathanOlder wrote: ↑31 Jan 2019, 09:24But they still scored more points last season than they have in the previous 2 years combined. What ever way you look at it, they improved massively. 93 points last season even thought they threw away 18 points in Australian in a way no one has ever done before. Against 47pts in 17, and 29pts in 16. So with the Ferrari clone, they improved massively.
The international company myWorld signs a multi-year agreement with Toro Rosso starting from 2019
https://scuderiatororosso.redbull.com/e ... ip-myworld