I find this very hard to believe, even cutting edge FDM carbon composites can't hold a candle to what traditional methods can accomplish.
It may be for the titanium parts...
The article is pretty specific about it being related to composite components.
This new type of 3D printing actually uses a material with similar properties to carbon fibre, enabling Ferrari to make actual parts for their car at a speed unprecedented in F1 car manufacturing. It is rumoured to be up to ten times faster than the normal process of making moulds, laying sheets of carbon fibre and then heating by use of an autoclave oven.
May be (as this is rumor) somebody just misunderstood with the name of the best 3D printers companiesdans79 wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 21:56The article is pretty specific about it being related to composite components.
This new type of 3D printing actually uses a material with similar properties to carbon fibre, enabling Ferrari to make actual parts for their car at a speed unprecedented in F1 car manufacturing. It is rumoured to be up to ten times faster than the normal process of making moulds, laying sheets of carbon fibre and then heating by use of an autoclave oven.
Mr.G wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 22:05May be (as this is rumor) somebody just misunderstood with the name of the best 3D printers companies
- https://www.carbon3d.com
The article is strongly suggesting that the team has found a way to 3D print structural components, instead of using traditional molded carbon fiber methods.As I said a little while ago, that's highly unlikely.Recently at the mandatory crash test in the CSI laboratories of Bollate, present was the technical delegate of the FIA Jo Bauer. Not a normal thing for the sports governing body to do and the reasons for their attendance became clear later on.
Ferrari has employed a new method of construction using a process similar to 3D printing. 3D printing is not new in F1, in fact, most teams use the technique to rapid prototype new performance parts for their cars at 1 to 1 scale and for the smaller scale wind tunnel models. Although there are some exceptions, most of these 3D printed parts are not structural or raced.
dans79 wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 22:58Mr.G wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 22:05May be (as this is rumor) somebody just misunderstood with the name of the best 3D printers companies
- https://www.carbon3d.com
Maybe, but that still pretty far away form what the article is hinting at.
The article is strongly suggesting that the team has found a way to 3D print structural components, instead of using traditional molded carbon fiber methods.As I said a little while ago, that's highly unlikely.Recently at the mandatory crash test in the CSI laboratories of Bollate, present was the technical delegate of the FIA Jo Bauer. Not a normal thing for the sports governing body to do and the reasons for their attendance became clear later on.
Ferrari has employed a new method of construction using a process similar to 3D printing. 3D printing is not new in F1, in fact, most teams use the technique to rapid prototype new performance parts for their cars at 1 to 1 scale and for the smaller scale wind tunnel models. Although there are some exceptions, most of these 3D printed parts are not structural or raced.
You can print carbon fiber already in two ways that I'm aware of.
I'd bet you can still machine a plastic mold from a solid block faster than you could print one. Take a look at this as a random example.AngelicPrincess wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 23:43What I think you are dismissing, is the possibility to 3D print moulds instead of the traditional machining method for some smaller parts that can accelerate the composite manufacturing process.
outsid3r wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:13 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXwtpcBXkAoSRrq.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXwtpcdXcAAU-S5.jpg
Are they using some kind of plastic composite for the "fins" (for the lack of a better word) in the bottom part of the bargeboards?
- They are matte black and it doesn't make sense painting these while leaving several other parts in this area showing naked carbon
- Stone chips/Debris seems to be showing a white material underneath
And you would be right if aero parts were simple to machine. When the parts you are trying to make are complex with no flats for machining setup, parts that need multiple setups to machine. Additive manufacturing methods are far quicker. Due to NDAs I cant post any comparison data unfortunately.dans79 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2019, 00:26I'd bet you can still machine a plastic mold from a solid block faster than you could print one. Take a look at this as a random example.AngelicPrincess wrote: ↑11 Feb 2019, 23:43What I think you are dismissing, is the possibility to 3D print moulds instead of the traditional machining method for some smaller parts that can accelerate the composite manufacturing process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1zCNjCFJhc
I could easily see them 3d print small non structural parts.