Not true. Marc Priestley does a better job of technical overview and is much more knowledgeable when it comes to Formula 1 technical aspects because he has actually worked long term in F1 and was McLaren's number 1 mechanic. His MCL34 overview (and all others) are much better.Juzh wrote: ↑18 Feb 2019, 09:50He knows, he just can't use other people's copyrighted stuff for his own analysis. He can use what's available out there for free, and at the time mclaren PR render shots were probably the only thing.makecry wrote: ↑18 Feb 2019, 02:55This is what I call doing something for the sake of doing it. A not so good overview imo. SHOULD have used the real car. An overview of a render using a generic FW is a waste of time imo. You'd expect someone who does technical overviews to know that.Jef Patat wrote: ↑17 Feb 2019, 20:24Overview by Scarbs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg2qwALYXjw
Edit: unfortunately on the renders
I agree he should delay the overview until more usefull stuff comes out, especially because people would still watch it even with a delay of a few days simply because he's the only one that does a proper technical analysis with some more nuanced information compared to lets say autosport which is more causal.