Thanks Jumpingfish
So Bottas today beat the Ferrari through S3, but is losing 3 tenths in S1 alone!
surely has to be engine modes ?
They go on to say that Ferrari had a relatively low top speed on that run (not under the top 6). And in the first sector, Vettel was slower than on his previous run by 0.162s. Assumption being that they are not running full power modes, but likely less fuel.AMuS wrote:Vettel schnappt sich auf der weichsten Sorte die Spitzenposition. In 1:16.352 Minuten büßt er 0,121 Sekunden auf Leclerc vom Vortag ein. Ferrari deckt die Karten trotzdem nicht auf. Man muss sich nur den Topspeed anschauen. Da taucht Vettel nicht unter den besten sechs auf. Und im ersten Sektor war Vettel beim Run zuvor 0,162 Sekunden schneller. Das deutet daraufhin, dass Ferrari die Power runtergeregelt hat. Dafür zaubert der Heppenheimer im letzten Sektor. Weniger Leistung, dafür etwas weniger Sprit? So machte es Ferrari laut Beobachtungen von Mercedes schon gestern.
he was on c5NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:14Vettel 16.3 on the C4 very impressive. 1.15's definitely in reach.
Amus is stupid.Phil wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:18AMuS's ticker seems to think Vettels time is on the C5 tire.
They go on to say that Ferrari had a relatively low top speed on that run (not under the top 6). And in the first sector, Vettel was slower than on his previous run by 0.162s. Assumption being that they are not running full power modes, but likely less fuel.AMuS wrote:Vettel schnappt sich auf der weichsten Sorte die Spitzenposition. In 1:16.352 Minuten büßt er 0,121 Sekunden auf Leclerc vom Vortag ein. Ferrari deckt die Karten trotzdem nicht auf. Man muss sich nur den Topspeed anschauen. Da taucht Vettel nicht unter den besten sechs auf. Und im ersten Sektor war Vettel beim Run zuvor 0,162 Sekunden schneller. Das deutet daraufhin, dass Ferrari die Power runtergeregelt hat. Dafür zaubert der Heppenheimer im letzten Sektor. Weniger Leistung, dafür etwas weniger Sprit? So machte es Ferrari laut Beobachtungen von Mercedes schon gestern.
EDIT: Autosport also corrected it; Vettel was indeed on the C5 tire.
Top-speed trap is not the same as the intermediate trap speeds.Jozsusz wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:27Amus is stupid.Phil wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:18AMuS's ticker seems to think Vettels time is on the C5 tire.
They go on to say that Ferrari had a relatively low top speed on that run (not under the top 6). And in the first sector, Vettel was slower than on his previous run by 0.162s. Assumption being that they are not running full power modes, but likely less fuel.AMuS wrote:Vettel schnappt sich auf der weichsten Sorte die Spitzenposition. In 1:16.352 Minuten büßt er 0,121 Sekunden auf Leclerc vom Vortag ein. Ferrari deckt die Karten trotzdem nicht auf. Man muss sich nur den Topspeed anschauen. Da taucht Vettel nicht unter den besten sechs auf. Und im ersten Sektor war Vettel beim Run zuvor 0,162 Sekunden schneller. Das deutet daraufhin, dass Ferrari die Power runtergeregelt hat. Dafür zaubert der Heppenheimer im letzten Sektor. Weniger Leistung, dafür etwas weniger Sprit? So machte es Ferrari laut Beobachtungen von Mercedes schon gestern.
EDIT: Autosport also corrected it; Vettel was indeed on the C5 tire.
According to the youtube live timing he was the fastest on the speed traps and he had the best sectors as well.
You sure ? Autosport said c4 on the 1.16.3siskue2005 wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:21he was on c5NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:14Vettel 16.3 on the C4 very impressive. 1.15's definitely in reach.
They did initially and they came back and corrected it.NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:38You sure ? Autosport said c4 on the 1.16.3siskue2005 wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:21he was on c5NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:14Vettel 16.3 on the C4 very impressive. 1.15's definitely in reach.
now saying C5 for the 1.16.2
Right after AS said it was C4 they posted this:NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:38You sure ? Autosport said c4 on the 1.16.3siskue2005 wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:21he was on c5NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 13:14Vettel 16.3 on the C4 very impressive. 1.15's definitely in reach.
now saying C5 for the 1.16.2