Capharol wrote: ↑25 Mar 2019, 01:42
LM10 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2019, 00:50
Capharol wrote: ↑25 Mar 2019, 00:43
this sentence made me think….
Albert Park is a unique circuit, no measurment possible on how the season really can/will go, and they maybe knew they had enough time on there hands to be the 3rd team on the grid at the AusGP and maybe even thought 5th might be the highest they can do..... so why running high DF when it doesn't really pay off anyway..... "just lets forget about AusGP, focus on the "normal" circuits" could be the thought …. and suddenly the finished 3rd with 1 car
this might be a controverse thinking, but who really knows how RB is thinking
Didn't RBR (Newey in particular) push to make China upgrades ready for Melbourne?
yes but where is the proof they used them? have we seen the parts they wanted to use for Melbourne? do we know what the upgrades looked like?
I haven'r seen those parts and hell I don't even know if they really used them.... because Sky F1 or any other reporter says they used them? did they see the part that should be used in Melbourne before or are they only thinking RB would use the part the had in Barcelona as the Melbourne part?
for the record i am only guessing but i think we all do so it's just a thought
Helmut Marko was quoted on several media telling that a very motivated Newey pushed forward China upgrades. Wether this is correct or just made up, I don't know, even though I can't imagine it being totally fake.
Claiming a thing, but not doing it is another possible option, of course. I as well couldn't catch any big changes in Melbourne.