
STR did a better job.
You would expect the two teams to talk about their different designs together, what works well and what doesn't work well.
STR clearly did not do a better job, else they would have a podium and not RBR. Also official statement is that it's not a major issue, but only details. So why do you think otherwise? Gut feeling?
No, no gut feeling.
So they already said that? I hadn't heard that yet. Thank you.
Yes.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/red- ... x/4365162/"It's not a conceptual problem, but a detail thing – and it's not for the first time it has happened. But the wind in Bahrain multiplied it."
"At the very latest for Barcelona it should be done."
Well spoken. I totally agree, but I think Barcelona is too early. Hopefully I am wrong.Ground Effect wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:23I think the less they say, (Marko) the better. With all of the statements he made, even before preseason, it seems he was way off the mark. Head down and push, push, push. I admire the way Honda have worked over the last 2 years especially, very little communication, and only when necessary. Some people think it's because their amateurs, but on the contrary, it's because they're professionals. When Tanabe makes a statement, he spends half the time being self analytical, almost critical, and insisting there's still a lot to do, we're not there yet. Meanwhile, they are almost there. Every area of the engine performance has been a massive step forward. Have you noticed how all 4 cars push from lights to flag, no indication of fuel saving? The good news is that Red Bull are an exceptional race team, so it's very likely that by Barcelona the car will be there, where it should have been from the start. I'm a McLaren fan, but I sincerely hoped that Red Bull would save us all from Mercedes, since Ferrari seems incapable.
I have a strong belief they'll take a big step forward in Barcelona because I suspect they knew they had issues right from preseason testing, just like in 2017, when they produced a car that was some way off the top two. By Barcelona, they had made big gains. Horner had made some suggestions during testing that if they had taken a wrong turn with aero, it would take some weeks to resolve. So Barcelona shouldn't be unrealistic.Wouter wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:35Well spoken. I totally agree, but I think Barcelona is too early. Hopefully I am wrong.Ground Effect wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:23I think the less they say, (Marko) the better. With all of the statements he made, even before preseason, it seems he was way off the mark. Head down and push, push, push. I admire the way Honda have worked over the last 2 years especially, very little communication, and only when necessary. Some people think it's because their amateurs, but on the contrary, it's because they're professionals. When Tanabe makes a statement, he spends half the time being self analytical, almost critical, and insisting there's still a lot to do, we're not there yet. Meanwhile, they are almost there. Every area of the engine performance has been a massive step forward. Have you noticed how all 4 cars push from lights to flag, no indication of fuel saving? The good news is that Red Bull are an exceptional race team, so it's very likely that by Barcelona the car will be there, where it should have been from the start. I'm a McLaren fan, but I sincerely hoped that Red Bull would save us all from Mercedes, since Ferrari seems incapable.
Ground Effect wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:49I have a strong belief they'll take a big step forward in Barcelona because I suspect they knew they had issues right from preseason testing, just like in 2017, when they produced a car that was some way off the top two. By Barcelona, they had made big gains. Horner had made some suggestions during testing that if they had taken a wrong turn with aero, it would take some weeks to resolve. So Barcelona shouldn't be unrealistic.
That is what I am a little bit afraid of, that they have to redesign the complete chassis.godlameroso wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:44Its a month away, if they understand the issues and it doesn't take a complete chassis redesign. They can certainly take a step forward by Barcelona.
It should be the gp2 engine again !!!amho wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 23:54
I saw verstapen's Q3 onboard lap that you have shared its link.
At the start line car keeps acceleration up to about 321kph before braking but at the end of lap about 2 sec before finish line car reach 300kph and does not accelerate at all for 4 sec while engine is at wot. it's weired because even if battery is empty at the end of lap but atleast we should see slight acceleration during that 4 sec , it seems like a problem.for sure ICE solely can beat drag at 300 kph even with the highest draggy setup.
I saw albon's lap his lap at the end was ok, accelerating all the time.
There is a definite aero issue with the RB15. It has a domino effect on all other aspects, including diminishing the battery quicker for similar performance compared to the STR14. At this level, most of these engines don't really exceed 305kph when there is no hybrid assist available.amho wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 23:54[quote=Juzh
I saw verstapen's Q3 onboard lap that you have shared its link.
At the start line car keeps acceleration up to about 321kph before braking but at the end of lap about 2 sec before finish line car reach 300kph and does not accelerate at all for 4 sec while engine is at wot. it's weired because even if battery is empty at the end of lap but atleast we should see slight acceleration during that 4 sec , it seems like a problem.for sure ICE solely can beat drag at 300 kph even with the highest draggy setup.
I saw albon's lap his lap at the end was ok, accelerating all the time.
The problem is that it will have to be a massive move in performance... Mercedes and Ferrari won’t stay static waiting for RBH and if they come into Barcelona with what they should have had for Melbourne, the top 2 will still have 5 weeks of development on them.Ground Effect wrote:I have a strong belief they'll take a big step forward in Barcelona because I suspect they knew they had issues right from preseason testing, just like in 2017, when they produced a car that was some way off the top two. By Barcelona, they had made big gains. Horner had made some suggestions during testing that if they had taken a wrong turn with aero, it would take some weeks to resolve. So Barcelona shouldn't be unrealistic.Wouter wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:35Well spoken. I totally agree, but I think Barcelona is too early. Hopefully I am wrong.Ground Effect wrote: ↑07 Apr 2019, 20:23I think the less they say, (Marko) the better. With all of the statements he made, even before preseason, it seems he was way off the mark. Head down and push, push, push. I admire the way Honda have worked over the last 2 years especially, very little communication, and only when necessary. Some people think it's because their amateurs, but on the contrary, it's because they're professionals. When Tanabe makes a statement, he spends half the time being self analytical, almost critical, and insisting there's still a lot to do, we're not there yet. Meanwhile, they are almost there. Every area of the engine performance has been a massive step forward. Have you noticed how all 4 cars push from lights to flag, no indication of fuel saving? The good news is that Red Bull are an exceptional race team, so it's very likely that by Barcelona the car will be there, where it should have been from the start. I'm a McLaren fan, but I sincerely hoped that Red Bull would save us all from Mercedes, since Ferrari seems incapable.