M840TR wrote: ↑03 May 2019, 18:52
diffuser wrote: ↑03 May 2019, 18:35
Xero wrote: ↑03 May 2019, 13:53
Absolutely! McLaren as a whole in seriously good shape moving forward.
To continue a point made earlier, the F1 and Automotive groups may be run separately, but they fall under the same umbrella. The Automotive profits help drive the F1 team, and Applied Technologies research, that was it's intended purpose. It's undoubtedly grown way beyond their initial expectations into it's own separate identity, but their image and prestige is still driven by the F1 operation. They will always feed off each other, money or otherwise.
I agree, this year's car is superior to last year's. I don't believe the situation at Mclaren was as dire as some people have made it out to be last year and I'm reluctant to say thing were that much better when this car was designed. This year's car was pretty much designed by the same people that designed last year's, + or - one or two people is not a big change in personnel between March 2018 and March 2019. It's not a far stretch to say that this car could have been built with no personnel changes at all.
I think when you lack budget compared to other teams, you take short cuts. Short cuts leave you vulnerable. Sometime those vulnerabilities are exposed other times they aren't. By their own admission, they missed stuff in CFD.
I'd reckon getting rid of your team principle, technical & engineering director is a pretty big change.
It would be if they would have done that.
-chief technical officer Tim Goss was removed from his position and later quit.
-racing director Eric Boullier Left.
+Sporting Director GIL DE FERRAN
To me they took the people that were under those 2 and just made them director positions interim.
+Added Pat Fry in Sept of 2018
POST START of 2019
+TECHNICAL DIRECTOR James Keys
+TEAM PRINCIPAL Andreas Seidl
The other 2 have come on line this year. I doubt they've done much yet.