Maybe the key to solve the tire problem is the suspension itself?bosyber wrote: ↑09 May 2019, 22:11Wow, yeah, if that's the case I can definitely see why they'd want to first test the new/renewed suspension in an on-track test before committing to using it for a race weekend; if that means they lose out a bit in s3 but are still as fast as in testing on the rest of the track, well that would be manageable (provided they get the tyres working).
How can a suspension broke a rim ??? Ok, if a suspension arm broke it can hit the wheel but that was not the case.
Why would they increase the size of the shark fin on it’s own? It’s been quite big anyway. For me, it’s a sign for a tighter engine cover. And by looking at it closely, it’s visible.f1316 wrote: ↑10 May 2019, 11:19If that’s true - and Ferrari had to revert to a more traditional suspension after the crash in testing - it would explain A LOT.
Separately, Chandok seems to think that the actual engine cover has been shrunk (in addition to the shark fin change) - that was my immediate impression when looking at the logo but then it’s change in placement convinced me otherwise. Thoughts?
The pretty significant ride height change under breaking was not there in test week 2 anymore. Same goes for the races.
Hmm.
I am not an expert either, but i do not believe the experts at Ferrari cant spot such a serious design flaw.tpe wrote: ↑10 May 2019, 20:14Hmm.
Do we know if any other team protested?
And something else. I am far from an expert, but could it be possible that the front wing design actually cools down the tires?