Don't agree. Williams have a Merc engine and are dead last. Compare it to giving a kid a bike. Give him a 50 speed racing drop handle bike if he is a wobbler or give him a 3 speed mountain bike?
I think you’re not starting from the beginning. McLaren started making moves to ditch Honda during Barcelona pre season tests of 2017. They were trying to see if they would get the Mercedes deal, then change engines a couple of months into the season, the rules allow it, by the way. Supply would not have been an issue because Mercedes had already made provisions for Manor, who had hoped to be on the grid, up until early 2017 they were trying to be rescued. But they stuck with Honda and the question of a 4th team arose for 2018 when McLaren were looking for the 2018 switch.RonDennis wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 20:19It's your interpretation. Mercedes said that they couldn't supply a fourth team, which meant that Renault was their only option. The article you linked even states that Renault is "open to their suggestion", not that they will have any influence on the design based on the contract.Ground Effect wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:17James Allen, during the winter test of 2017, he said McLaren wanted a works level deal, which simply means they pay for it. Zak Brown also said that ONLY Renault gave them all that they asked for, which clearly means there’s more to it.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mcla ... 1/1390232/
https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/2188 ... es-mclaren
That's all good and well but what if by changing Engines they are gonna destabilize their chassis who is now designed around the Renault Engine and lose yet another year to design it around the Mercedes engine?SmallSoldier wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 21:39If the rumor is true and Mclaren has a chance to have what has clearly been the benchmark in the sport since the Hybrid era started it would be great news... This is a sport of incremental improvements and if the Mercedes engine would provide a couple tenths, the team would be well served with it.
The Renault engine is good and a clear improvement for the team over the Honda engine, but there are still some question marks in regards to it’s reliability... The Mercedes unit on the other hand is arguably the best overall PU (when considering power and reliability) and the one that has won every Championship, why wouldn’t they want it?
Talking about Williams or Racing Point as references of the PU is completely absurd since their performance (or lack thereof) isn’t related to the PU, but completely regarding their Chassis/Aero packages.
Time will tell
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Mercedes packaging isn’t inferior and could actually benefit the performance of the car... I’ve always thought that people over react to the change in engines, if done properly and early enough it shouldn’t create many compromises at all... Teams that have changed from one supplier to another have not suffered because of it (STR last year, RBH this year)... If the concern is because of 2018, the problems of the MCL33 didn’t had anything to do with the change from Honda to Renault.Darth-Piekus wrote:That's all good and well but what if by changing Engines they are gonna destabilize their chassis who is now designed around the Renault Engine and lose yet another year to design it around the Mercedes engine?SmallSoldier wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 21:39If the rumor is true and Mclaren has a chance to have what has clearly been the benchmark in the sport since the Hybrid era started it would be great news... This is a sport of incremental improvements and if the Mercedes engine would provide a couple tenths, the team would be well served with it.
The Renault engine is good and a clear improvement for the team over the Honda engine, but there are still some question marks in regards to it’s reliability... The Mercedes unit on the other hand is arguably the best overall PU (when considering power and reliability) and the one that has won every Championship, why wouldn’t they want it?
Talking about Williams or Racing Point as references of the PU is completely absurd since their performance (or lack thereof) isn’t related to the PU, but completely regarding their Chassis/Aero packages.
Time will tell
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
A customer engine deal is the best McLaren can hope for until the engine regulations
If Merc pull out of F1, what makes you so sure they'll keep up the investment in the PU?taperoo2k wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 22:27A customer engine deal is the best McLaren can hope for until the engine regulations
change and they can attract a manufacturer to partner with them in a works deal.
I'd definitely swap the Renault PU for a Mercedes PU if the option is there.
As for EJ ? He's got a few stories right in the past, but we'll see.
If you don't get the chassis design correct then you'll be in heaps of
trouble no matter if you've got the best or worst engine on the grid in
the back of the car. McLaren have turned their fortunes around, so a change
in PU shouldn't pose too much of a problem if it's for 2020. A mid season swap
might be more problematic but the changes the team has made should
see them through it.
You're constantly talking about a works status, but you haven't shown one source for that story. There are no differences between the engines and modes these days, so what would be the advantage of that so called "works status".Ground Effect wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 21:37I think you’re not starting from the beginning. McLaren started making moves to ditch Honda during Barcelona pre season tests of 2017. They were trying to see if they would get the Mercedes deal, then change engines a couple of months into the season, the rules allow it, by the way. Supply would not have been an issue because Mercedes had already made provisions for Manor, who had hoped to be on the grid, up until early 2017 they were trying to be rescued. But they stuck with Honda and the question of a 4th team arose for 2018 when McLaren were looking for the 2018 switch.RonDennis wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 20:19It's your interpretation. Mercedes said that they couldn't supply a fourth team, which meant that Renault was their only option. The article you linked even states that Renault is "open to their suggestion", not that they will have any influence on the design based on the contract.Ground Effect wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:17
James Allen, during the winter test of 2017, he said McLaren wanted a works level deal, which simply means they pay for it. Zak Brown also said that ONLY Renault gave them all that they asked for, which clearly means there’s more to it.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mcla ... 1/1390232/
https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/2188 ... es-mclaren
James Allen had reported that Mansour Ojjeh was relying on the good relationship he had over the years with the Mercedes boss to secure the Manor allocation for 2017, but the works status request made it a non starter. Of course that was not the official reason given, as you can imagine. There were articles on it, like below
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/39290908
If Renault pull out of F1, what makes you so sure they'll keep up the investment in the PU?diffuser wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 22:35If Merc pull out of F1, what makes you so sure they'll keep up the investment in the PU?taperoo2k wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 22:27A customer engine deal is the best McLaren can hope for until the engine regulations
change and they can attract a manufacturer to partner with them in a works deal.
I'd definitely swap the Renault PU for a Mercedes PU if the option is there.
As for EJ ? He's got a few stories right in the past, but we'll see.
If you don't get the chassis design correct then you'll be in heaps of
trouble no matter if you've got the best or worst engine on the grid in
the back of the car. McLaren have turned their fortunes around, so a change
in PU shouldn't pose too much of a problem if it's for 2020. A mid season swap
might be more problematic but the changes the team has made should
see them through it.