very very bad news for Anthoine Hubert...
please can we keep the subject of Hubert out of the normal threads
They have been good on straights compared to others who generally run with more downforce (and therefore drag), Spa is a track where everybody sheds downforce as much as possible and the Renault engine doesn’t have the grunt of the Ferrari or Mercedes that is sitting in the back of the RP, Haas or Alfa cars. Renault were strong in Canada (another power track) so it makes sense to be behind them here too.ME4ME wrote: ↑31 Aug 2019, 17:12Was thinking the very same thing. Earlier in the season the Mclaren appeared to be very aero efficient and good on the straights. Baku and other places showed that. Ricciardo even commented on that. Yet somehow, something went wrong this weekend. Could be tire related as well as not getting an optimal time in from either of the drivers. Still expecting Norris and Sainz to go forward in the race.ALO_Power wrote: ↑31 Aug 2019, 16:41One would assume that Spa and Monza would be very strong races for McLaren since the MCL34 seems to have very low drag and alongside with the Renault engine it gave us the impression that both of those races would be some great opportunities, however the opposite happened. Pretty strange. Also as far as aero philosophy goes, McLaren's is similar to Ferrari's but that didn't show here. Obviously Ferrari has way more power available but still. On the other hand indeed strange stuff since Merc is very far behind in qualy pace to Ferrari.
Yeah, my money is not on a lack of power...Jackles-UK wrote: ↑31 Aug 2019, 19:59They have been good on straights compared to others who generally run with more downforce (and therefore drag), Spa is a track where everybody sheds downforce as much as possible and the Renault engine doesn’t have the grunt of the Ferrari or Mercedes that is sitting in the back of the RP, Haas or Alfa cars. Renault were strong in Canada (another power track) so it makes sense to be behind them here too.ME4ME wrote: ↑31 Aug 2019, 17:12Was thinking the very same thing. Earlier in the season the Mclaren appeared to be very aero efficient and good on the straights. Baku and other places showed that. Ricciardo even commented on that. Yet somehow, something went wrong this weekend. Could be tire related as well as not getting an optimal time in from either of the drivers. Still expecting Norris and Sainz to go forward in the race.ALO_Power wrote: ↑31 Aug 2019, 16:41One would assume that Spa and Monza would be very strong races for McLaren since the MCL34 seems to have very low drag and alongside with the Renault engine it gave us the impression that both of those races would be some great opportunities, however the opposite happened. Pretty strange. Also as far as aero philosophy goes, McLaren's is similar to Ferrari's but that didn't show here. Obviously Ferrari has way more power available but still. On the other hand indeed strange stuff since Merc is very far behind in qualy pace to Ferrari.
Still, Norris was within a tenth of both Haas cars in Q2 and only a few tenths from Hulkenberg in 7th, Sainz set his Q1 banker on used tyres and got unlucky with the red flag for Giovinazzi. Not the desperate disappointment it looked like it might be after FP3.
Fabrega just said he's going to be P15search wrote: ↑01 Sep 2019, 13:04Sainz got another couple of new engine parts (ES and MGU-K) for the race. Shouldn't make much of a difference in terms of his starting spot, if I understand the rules correctly (Kubica is last anyway and Sainz was quickest from the 5 cars with a 15+ penalty, which should mean P15)
edit: I mixed things up there I think. Should be P18 for Sainz
You mean 2019/2020?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑01 Sep 2019, 14:53Let's just hope that it was only a set up mistake and they actually went for a race focus set up to gain a lot of positions today. Also since the championship is still not over how are updates going on the car? Are we gonna keep going for 2018 or are we gonna sacrifice it for 2019? This 4th place is a big bet and an achievement for climbing back to the top. We got to conquer it.