Emag wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 14:24
Snorked wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 14:07
Hell hath no fury like a Hulk scorned
After they ended his F1 career, maybe he ratted them out?
Highly doubt it. There would obviously be contract clauses in place for those sort of things. If he did indeed do it, and Renault proves that, Nico would face some very expensive lawsuits, not to mention getting his reputation destroyed. Not worth the risk of killing your career to get some petty "revenge".
I don't think that's 100% correct, yes it would impact his career (unofficially) but I don't think there is going to be lawsuits. Your essentially suggesting if somebody outs a cheater, the cheater is found guilty, then the cheater can take the individual to court and the law would be on the cheats side. I'm sure the law would be on the individual side not the cheats.
There would be non-disclosure clauses of course, but I'm sure it would fall apart if the tech is illegal because there is a point where it could become blackmail.
Normally the driver would not be told enough details in the first place.
PowerandtheGlory wrote: ↑14 Oct 2019, 09:34
I think the issue seems to be if the brake bias is pre-set.. But if the driver controls this then its not and issue. Say they have
3 settings for around the track and the driver cycles between each one?
ARTICLE 11 : BRAKE SYSTEM
11.1.4 Any change to, or modulation of, the brake system, other than any movement of the minimal flexible parts described in Article 11.4 to 11.6, whilst the car is on the track must be made by the driver's direct physical input or by the system referred to in Article 11.9, and may not be pre‐set.
3
pre-set settings?