You need to make it slim in order to have a decent size of cape - the width of the cape has to be inside the bodywork "box" created by the rules.
You need to make it slim in order to have a decent size of cape - the width of the cape has to be inside the bodywork "box" created by the rules.
JasonF1 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2020, 12:10I find it very interesting that the teams are exploring their competitor's sidepod shape and applying it onto their car instead of pursuing their own philosophy year after year. The SF1000's one is highly inspired from the RB15 from last year while this RB16 take some inspiration from the W09/W10.
Moving the lower wishbone forward changes the toe curve more aggressively. Maybe they want more rear steering effect?kfrantzios wrote: ↑12 Feb 2020, 12:35https://i.imgur.com/mgkqMrq.jpg
Quite a difference on the rear suspension. The green line is the aproximate position of the lower wishbone in rb15. It was underneath the pullrod.
I think this shape of sidepod has been a RedBull design cue for sometime. It's similar in concept to the RB06 and its sloping sidepods. It seems to be a "Newey thing".f1316 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2020, 12:35I find the sidepod shape interesting - much rounder at the front and actually less jelly mold, necessitating that dramatic downslope which the Ferrari doesn’t have. As already mentioned, it’s also using much more height in the engine cover vs the Ferrari which is completely away from the shark fin area.
Nose is definitely narrower