Lovely photographs, thanks for posting.MtthsMlw wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 18:11SF1000
https://www.f1analisitecnica.com/wp-con ... scaled.jpg
via @FunoAT
SF90
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/th ... ?s=612x612
Exhaust and wastegate are placed differently. Possibly due to changes of the gearbox.
I have heard many pundits mention so far that most teams are going to adopt this type of attitude this year. In other words, everyone is expected to front-load their development...bring a lot of stuff fast and early and hope for the best. And then at the first sign that it's not enough...abandon this year entirely for a 100% focus on 2021.
What kind of an adjustion was that? The time from Ferrari is basically the one they clocked in testing without intending a performance run. These times say nothing. Don't know how you can adjust them without knowing the fuel load and power the cars run in the first place.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:52Who saw the "THE RACE" video on youtube? The old Autosport guys...
Gary Anderson tried to adjust everyone's times for tires and fuel.
He has Mercedes #1 at 1'16.432, Red Bull second, RACING POINT THIRD, and Ferrari NINTH down at 1'18.289.
I know it is just testing, and it is still early, and the season hasn't even begun, and all the teams will engage in a lot of development work. But...zibby43 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 09:34From the Leo Turrini blog:
"The first aerodynamic package of the SF1000 does not work. So far the problems of 2019 have not been solved. The car suffers from understeer and the performance on the dry lap are still far away from the Mercedes (and Red Bull) levels."
Turrini, a Ferrari insider, had reported a few weeks ago that the SF1000 had not achieved the expected results in the wind tunnel.
https://www.quotidiano.net/blog/turrini ... tto-5.6175
Watch the video! He did mention that you obviously have to make some guesses and we don't know fuel loads, etc., but you can try to adjust for tire compound which is known, etc.LM10 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:58What kind of an adjustion was that? The time from Ferrari is basically the one they clocked in testing without intending a performance run. These times say nothing. Don't know how you can adjust them without knowing the fuel load and power the cars run in the first place.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:52Who saw the "THE RACE" video on youtube? The old Autosport guys...
Gary Anderson tried to adjust everyone's times for tires and fuel.
He has Mercedes #1 at 1'16.432, Red Bull second, RACING POINT THIRD, and Ferrari NINTH down at 1'18.289.
I can remember his adjustments last season when he told Ferrari was way ahead. Gary Anderson might have been a clever guy back then, but I'm not sure about now anymore. He suggested the McLaren of 2018 to be very fast. We all know what happened.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 22:03Watch the video! He did mention that you obviously have to make some guesses and we don't know fuel loads, etc., but you can try to adjust for tire compound which is known, etc.LM10 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:58What kind of an adjustion was that? The time from Ferrari is basically the one they clocked in testing without intending a performance run. These times say nothing. Don't know how you can adjust them without knowing the fuel load and power the cars run in the first place.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:52Who saw the "THE RACE" video on youtube? The old Autosport guys...
Gary Anderson tried to adjust everyone's times for tires and fuel.
He has Mercedes #1 at 1'16.432, Red Bull second, RACING POINT THIRD, and Ferrari NINTH down at 1'18.289.
This comes from Gary Anderson; he's a clever guy and designed the Jordan 191 among other things, so he's not some idiot Autosport writer.
Everyone is reading something into the comments, including all the reporters who know these guys on a personal level. No one thinks it's a bluff.Jip wrote: ↑21 Feb 2020, 16:26Still doesn't mean anything, Mercedes said the same last year, and look what happened in Melbourne. Don't read to much in the comments of Mattia.Ringleheim wrote: ↑21 Feb 2020, 15:30Bad news from Mattia Binotto...as mentioned just now during Sky Sport's televised Testing. I"m watching online. Mentioned by Ted Kravitz...
The car is not a Mercedes beater now, but may be by the end of the season.
Will the car be new or different next week at the second test? No, this is the car we will take to Melbourne, with a few changes.
Mood is said to be downbeat.
GREAT.
Try to read this - https://www.mercedesamgf1.com/en/news/2 ... s-learned/Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 22:10Everyone is reading something into the comments, including all the reporters who know these guys on a personal level. No one thinks it's a bluff.Jip wrote: ↑21 Feb 2020, 16:26Still doesn't mean anything, Mercedes said the same last year, and look what happened in Melbourne. Don't read to much in the comments of Mattia.Ringleheim wrote: ↑21 Feb 2020, 15:30Bad news from Mattia Binotto...as mentioned just now during Sky Sport's televised Testing. I"m watching online. Mentioned by Ted Kravitz...
The car is not a Mercedes beater now, but may be by the end of the season.
Will the car be new or different next week at the second test? No, this is the car we will take to Melbourne, with a few changes.
Mood is said to be downbeat.
GREAT.
Ted Kravitz mentioned how Vettel is incapable of not perfectly telegraphing his emotions and you always know exactly how he is feeling. He is always either "happy, fun" Vettel, depressed, dark Vettel, or a little something in between.
Ted said right now Vettel is somewhere between depressed and "in between". I.E., he's not happy b/c he knows the car doesn't work.
Those Ferrari guys all know what was wrong with last year's car, they all know what they wanted to fix, they all know what the plan was, and they have just turned hundreds of laps on a dry track with good weather. If the car is not there, they are all going to know it.
Either the car is a disappointment (if not complete failure) or the entire team is putting on the most cleverly conceived hoax and acting job F1 has ever seen.
Watch Binotto deliver those comments! He sounds like he just found out his child died.\
Which in a sense, may be true, seeing as he is the father of the car.
You must be really new to the F1 world, because you should know that, despite being an extremely clever guy, Gary Anderson, more often than not, wrote and said completely wrong things about F1 in general (especially during the pre-season testings).Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:52This comes from Gary Anderson; he's a clever guy and designed the Jordan 191 among other things, so he's not some idiot Autosport writer.
Yeah, yeah, it's quite obvious that you don't remember the extremely well crafted sandbagging done by Mercedes in 2019 pre-season testings, where Toto Wolff spoke exactly like Binotto did this year.Ringleheim wrote: Either the car is a disappointment (if not complete failure) or the entire team is putting on the most cleverly conceived hoax and acting job F1 has ever seen.
This is the same guy that said Mclaren was going to be fighting with Williams last year.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 22:03This comes from Gary Anderson; he's a clever guy and designed the Jordan 191 among other things, so he's not some idiot Autosport writer.
He's got one thing wrong. We don't know the fuel (and engine) levels.Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:52Who saw the "THE RACE" video on youtube? The old Autosport guys...
Gary Anderson tried to adjust everyone's times for tires and fuel.
He has Mercedes #1 at 1'16.432, Red Bull second, RACING POINT THIRD, and Ferrari NINTH down at 1'18.289.
He also designed 192 and 193