This PC correctness is driving me crazy...
Simple... Best Man / Woman for the Job...
Stop Blaming Whites for Everything...
Lol "Race quotas" that would be a slap in the face. LolHungarianRacer wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 12:31This isn't an April Fool's joke, is it?.... Will they now introduce "race quotas" in their personnel recruitment protocols?... If not, they'll make themselves look like massive hypocrites by around this time of next year, I reckon....
There is no indication that F1 teams are the exception of the rule (the “rule” that you need less qualifications as a white male then a woman, people of color, etc, or/and get payed less).
I have spent so many years in corporate settings to know this will only be a "half assed" exercise just to tick a few boxes.
I run a business and when we seek new employees, take a guess what the large percentage of applicants are. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to therefore conclude who we will likely hire. And yes, we hire "the best qualified for the job". Because we are more concerned about getting stuff done and making money rather than the ethic background of our employees? I really don't see the point where and how the skin color or the ethnic background is relevant even in the slightest to these discussions. It feels more as if some sometimes are looking for "hidden agendas" in places where the answer to the question is way simpler.Jolle wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:13This is indeed the defence I’ve been battening for years, “we take the most qualified”. Many studies and experience from people in job placement deny this. Even in a liberal county as the Netherlands its easier to get a job when you you’re white with a criminal record then when you have a colour with a degree.
So you are saying there are only certain ethnicity people who are qualified? Isnt that itself ignorant comment?Phil wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:45I run a business and when we seek new employees, take a guess what the large percentage of applicants are. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to therefore conclude who we will likely hire. And yes, we hire "the best qualified for the job". Because we are more concerned about getting stuff done and making money rather than the ethic background of our employees? I really don't see the point where and how the skin color or the ethnic background is relevant even in the slightest to these discussions. It feels more as if some sometimes are looking for "hidden agendas" in places where the answer to the question is way simpler.Jolle wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:13This is indeed the defence I’ve been battening for years, “we take the most qualified”. Many studies and experience from people in job placement deny this. Even in a liberal county as the Netherlands its easier to get a job when you you’re white with a criminal record then when you have a colour with a degree.
The same argument is also in regards to equality between men and women. It's not my fault that in IT, there are more men and for some reason, women generally aren't geeks.
I really don't see it as strange when big cooperations like Mercedes have less diversity, more a logical consequence of what is available on the market and who is qualified.
I like to think about racism as a good vs evil thing, not a political item. That some politicians make it into something political, is their problem.V12-POWER wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 17:01All the greats said “keep politics out of F1”
Now we have this “wonderful” era where we are full of “diversity” supporting “peaceful protesters” that coincidentally all have certain political bias towards one side.
This political game will not end well.
Companies will play along the trend, this is normal and always happens, what really angers me is racing drivers playing the victim card and others promoting it in other ways.
Stick to driving and shut the hell up
No, the point was that companies/cooperations/businesses employ what is generally available to them and it's within their rights to take the best "bang for buck" they can get. To the point, it has really nothing to do with ethnicity so therefore looking for agendas that are irrelevant is what I disagree with. I have not made any attempt to answer why perhaps some people with different ethnic background find themselves not hired. Maybe they are simply fewer of them? That would pretty much explain my own experience, just as much as why there are more men in IT than women (and thus more men are hired statistically). Doesn't mean that one is better than the other. It's just a logical consequence of the numbers.
I agree with some of your points but in bold is highlights why you need to do more research! We need to be aware of how the different races came into this big melting pot and the thinking behind why they were brought into it.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:41I am sick and tired of the virtue signalling. Especially by companies that at the same time use labour under horrible conditions (electronics suppliers for example). Also this whole white guilt thing. How am I supposed to influence the actions of generations that had been dead for 200 years when I was born? Not to mention that seeing my grandpa's profession (farmer without owning land) I am pretty sure generations before my grandpa may have been slaves themselves. I am not even going to go into BLM which started out as something sincere but has since been hijacked for political gains. So what are F1-teams supposed to do? Hire less qualified engineers just because they are black? THAT would be racism in it's purest form! Hire the best ones, provide equal chances. Equal chances is not the same as equal outcomes. And a white dominated sport? Please remind me who the current reigning 6x WDC is that has had the best car for the past 6 or 7 years?
I am sorry Jolle,Jolle wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:13This is indeed the defence I’ve been battening for years, “we take the most qualified”. Many studies and experience from people in job placement deny this. Even in a liberal county as the Netherlands its easier to get a job when you you’re white with a criminal record then when you have a colour with a degree.RZS10 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:01If you had read my post more carefully you would have realized the Wednesday was about the twitter avis and 2021 was for the livery ...
Mercedes isn't really admitting they're "being bad at diversity" or w/e but rather that among those that they deemed to be qualified for the job just 3% were from 'minority ethnic groups' (whatever that means) and that's why they'll start some 'targeted education initiatives to encourage and support talented people from under-represented backgrounds who aspire to reach F1' ... it's about getting more of said group into F1 tech/engineering/whatever because as of now there's apparently not that many of em ... it's not like there's a pool of 50/50 '''minority''' and 'non-minority' and they only picked the latter because they're racist ... they will always pick the most qualified for the position.
V12-POWER wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 17:01All the greats said “keep politics out of F1”
Now we have this “wonderful” era where we are full of “diversity” supporting “peaceful protesters” that coincidentally all have certain political bias towards one side.
This political game will not end well.
Companies will play along the trend, this is normal and always happens, what really angers me is racing drivers playing the victim card and others promoting it in other ways.
Stick to driving and shut the hell up
Maybe because English is not my native language. But what I was saying is: say there happen to be 20 super engineers. 5 happen to be black. Are you then forced to hire 5 mediocre black engineers just because of this whole PC culture? Or do you hire the best 20 you cant get and accept it is 15/5 divided. Same with other branches. And if roles where reversed and it were 15 blacks and 5 whites, I am sure the PC crowd suddenly think THEN it is oke to not have quotas.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 17:07I agree with some of your points but in bold is highlights why you need to do more research! We need to be aware of how the different races came into this big melting pot and the thinking behind why they were brought into it.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2020, 16:41I am sick and tired of the virtue signalling. Especially by companies that at the same time use labour under horrible conditions (electronics suppliers for example). Also this whole white guilt thing. How am I supposed to influence the actions of generations that had been dead for 200 years when I was born? Not to mention that seeing my grandpa's profession (farmer without owning land) I am pretty sure generations before my grandpa may have been slaves themselves. I am not even going to go into BLM which started out as something sincere but has since been hijacked for political gains. So what are F1-teams supposed to do? Hire less qualified engineers just because they are black? THAT would be racism in it's purest form! Hire the best ones, provide equal chances. Equal chances is not the same as equal outcomes. And a white dominated sport? Please remind me who the current reigning 6x WDC is that has had the best car for the past 6 or 7 years?
At your second bolded part.. How many Black Engineers do you know that are under qualified? this is a very strange comment!
Done work woth engineers from all over the world and what I learn is "a man is just a man." there are smart engineesrs.. Dumb engineers........ everywhere... Even "Zee Germans" have a few shockers too! People are just people.
Another thing; usually, minorities have to be overqualified to get into any "token" post. I believe so called minority posts should be encouraged for now until those ethnic communities get more developed themselves. It is not easy to pursue engineering coming from poor communites no matter the race. It is a social responsibility to help poor communities.