It's actually the ancillary components inside the car, which in turn affect the gearbox sensors, rather than the gearbox itself. Which is critical, as those other ancillary components can be replaced with fresh, newly designed/manufactured components without running afoul of the "5 consecutive races for a gearbox" rule.atanatizante wrote: ↑07 Jul 2020, 14:30Mercedes admits W11 design has fundamental gearbox issue!
They think that repeat gearbox problem on its W11 would be inevitable with its current car configuration, after revealing that a build-up of electrical noise is triggering its issues: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... e/4827558/
Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.zibby43 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 16:25Update on the gearbox sensor issue:
https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 16:40Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.zibby43 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 16:25Update on the gearbox sensor issue:
https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.zibby43 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 17:58Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 16:40Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.zibby43 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 16:25Update on the gearbox sensor issue:
https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
I think a simple fix via software (filtering) would have been done over the weekend as well. They knew that problem on Friday already. So the real fix of the issue might actually take longer and the countermeasurements Fabrega is talking about might be no fixing, but reducing the issue.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 19:28It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.
Appreciate the insight. One of the reasons I love this forum.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 19:28It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.
I just had a wheel alignment done on my car, as it went through a couple of new front tires in 5 months.ncx wrote: ↑09 Jul 2020, 13:28After winter testing, iirc, the general take on the DAS was that it allows to zero the toe on the straight while putting it back in the corner, hence giving much more scope for toe optimisation, including larger toe in corners without comprising the straight, tyre wear reduction and possibly aero advantages. The currently most common story is instead that it is used to increase toe on the straight to warm the tyres. Of course it may well be that they use it differently on different tracks, although not during the race as apparently there are only two settings available to the drivers. Is there any direct conclusive evidence on how it was used in Austria, say, from onboard camera footage in which the change in toe is visible?
Seems likely. Also, I recall a radio transmission to Bottas that he'd have to go further on the DAS setting to get the tyres warmed during the 1st SC of last Sunday's race, so I doubt there is just a binary setting for it, though there maybe notches and a limited amount of pre-sets per weekend.Holm86 wrote: ↑09 Jul 2020, 13:50I just had a wheel alignment done on my car, as it went through a couple of new front tires in 5 months.ncx wrote: ↑09 Jul 2020, 13:28After winter testing, iirc, the general take on the DAS was that it allows to zero the toe on the straight while putting it back in the corner, hence giving much more scope for toe optimisation, including larger toe in corners without comprising the straight, tyre wear reduction and possibly aero advantages. The currently most common story is instead that it is used to increase toe on the straight to warm the tyres. Of course it may well be that they use it differently on different tracks, although not during the race as apparently there are only two settings available to the drivers. Is there any direct conclusive evidence on how it was used in Austria, say, from onboard camera footage in which the change in toe is visible?
After the alignment the gasmilage even went up by 10%.
I think DAS enables Mercedes to use a bit more aggresive toe out, and uses DAS to control tire wear/temperatures and fuel efficiency. The more aggresive toe, can be used to get more heat into the tires during safety car.
But ofc it will be different from track to track. But there are a lot of minor issues DAS can solve. The geometry setup can be less compromized ...