No b-spec planned. I expect some further updates in scale of the recent ones in Hungary as well. Like some bargeboard stuff and maybe a bigger cape.
ferrari is behind in every aspect of the car. it will take years to see it back in frontMichaelFerrari wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 17:53I think it all comes down to politics.
Ferrari designed this car with last year's engine in mind, so hoping to add downforce (less drag) and the best engine on the grid.
They got "caught" and now they must run an underpowered engine with too much downforce to carry.
My gut feeling is that if you put last year's engine in this SF1000, it will be bloody fast, competing with the mercs.
There 's no point bashing Ferrari as if all of a sudde they became dumb in F1.
Their trick was too obvious last year, now they are paying the price!
Don' t try to make me believe no other team is twisting the rules, that's pure hypocrisy.
Ferrari must improve their politics to beat merc, Toto is too good at it.
It is very confusing that the supposedly "high downforce" Ferrari is not more competitive in wet conditions.
Yea, today's qualifying showed that the Ferrari not only lacks power, but has significant aero issues. Their cornering was not that bad last week when it was dry, but whatever their aero problem is, there surely is one. And today's qualifying definitely showed that Ferrari indeed must have some big correlation issues.JordanMugen wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 18:52It is very confusing that the supposedly "high downforce" Ferrari is not more competitive in wet conditions.
I thought the Ferraris would be in the top 5.
They run much less wing than others. Go check pictures yourself. I'm not saying they are great but it should be much better tomorrow in dry race.LM10 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 18:57Yea, today's qualifying showed that the Ferrari not only lacks power, but has significant aero issues. Their cornering was not that bad last week when it was dry, but whatever their aero problem is, there surely is one. And today's qualifying definitely showed that Ferrari indeed must have some big correlation issues.JordanMugen wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 18:52It is very confusing that the supposedly "high downforce" Ferrari is not more competitive in wet conditions.
I thought the Ferraris would be in the top 5.
My guess has been that they might have built the car around a powerful PU, meaning with much downforce and therefore quite draggy, but today there was no sign of that downforce so I'm not sure anymore.
You're right about the wing. I hope they will have an easier going in the race tomorrow.nemanja wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 19:02They run much less wing than others. Go check pictures yourself. I'm not saying they are great but it should be much better tomorrow in dry race.LM10 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 18:57Yea, today's qualifying showed that the Ferrari not only lacks power, but has significant aero issues. Their cornering was not that bad last week when it was dry, but whatever their aero problem is, there surely is one. And today's qualifying definitely showed that Ferrari indeed must have some big correlation issues.JordanMugen wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 18:52
It is very confusing that the supposedly "high downforce" Ferrari is not more competitive in wet conditions.
I thought the Ferraris would be in the top 5.
My guess has been that they might have built the car around a powerful PU, meaning with much downforce and therefore quite draggy, but today there was no sign of that downforce so I'm not sure anymore.
because... they would come in last in tomorrow's race?Silent Storm wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 19:42Why did they not go for high downforce wing? They don't have the straight-line speed to overtake anyone tomorrow so I don't understand why they went for low downforce when it was clear since Thursday it was going to rain on Saturday.