The ending was properly hilarious. A satire on Lewis perhaps
Patrese was old by that time and what are you talking about? Mansell won the 1991 championship and he was fairly ok in 1992. Many claim that Mansell was unlucky like Alonso getting to teams when they were on their last legs or not competitive like the first time on Williams and on Lotus and when he replaced Hakkinen on Mclaren.fouad1979 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:09Man patrese was destroyed by Michael and Mansel sacked by williams cause he was not so competitive and focusDarth-Piekus wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:05Unless you are sarcastic that is blasphemy. Mansell and Patrese are much better drivers that have driven on a more competitive era with harder to control cars.
Exactly... Starting at the front with potentially a chance for free air (let’s face it, the Mercedes and RBR will probably drive into the distance in a couple of laps)... Therefore there is potential to have a good gap to the front that could help preserve the tires.proteus wrote:Well, you can burn mediums in traffic quite quickly as well.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:26Having a brand new set of mediums for the race could also be an advantage... a Qualifying lap should take a good amount of life out of the tires since they have them at the limit, therefore potentially you have a couple more laps in storage with the mediums during the race and that could make a difference in terms of pace.Macklaren wrote: I don't know...Pirelli says starting on Medium is only the 3rd quickest strategy here. Even two-stopping is supposed to be quicker than that. We will see...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Man ayrton won in 1991 and in 1992 with the williams'electronic advantage and active suspension there was no competition for williams and they won the championship with mansel who was sacked months after to get prost in the car with HillDarth-Piekus wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:46Patrese was old by that time and what are you talking about? Mansell won the 1991 championship and he was fairly ok in 1992. Many claim that Mansell was unlucky like Alonso getting to teams when they were on their last legs or not competitive like the first time on Williams and on Lotus and when he replaced Hakkinen on Mclaren.fouad1979 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:09Man patrese was destroyed by Michael and Mansel sacked by williams cause he was not so competitive and focusDarth-Piekus wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:05Unless you are sarcastic that is blasphemy. Mansell and Patrese are much better drivers that have driven on a more competitive era with harder to control cars.
Best McLaren time in 2019SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:56A couple of interesting pieces of stats in regards to the overall pace of the car:
A) The improvement year on year is interesting, we shouldn’t focus too much on the absolute number since track conditions (temperature, wind, etc) will have an effect, but it’s interesting to see the improvement against the competition... Not only has the car improved year on year, but it’s clear that Mercedes has also made an important improvement from the engine and we will have it in the back of car next year
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202008 ... ad648c.jpg
B) Slow speed was one of the biggest weakness of the MCL34, watching them as third best team in S3 today is very encouraging since now we are not only trying to maximize the strengths of the car (last year the focus was on low drag races and not expecting good performance in tracks with a lot of slow corners)
We should also note that Ferrari run a very low drag configuration with Leclerc (therefore their performance in S1, S2) while Mclaren seems to have focus more on Race Pace
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202008 ... c80e13.jpg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This is based on the best potential time “by the team”, therefore trying to minimize driver impact... It’s the best way to find what the Ultimate Pace of a car is.Lucky wrote:Best McLaren time in 2019SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 17:56A couple of interesting pieces of stats in regards to the overall pace of the car:
A) The improvement year on year is interesting, we shouldn’t focus too much on the absolute number since track conditions (temperature, wind, etc) will have an effect, but it’s interesting to see the improvement against the competition... Not only has the car improved year on year, but it’s clear that Mercedes has also made an important improvement from the engine and we will have it in the back of car next year
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202008 ... ad648c.jpg
B) Slow speed was one of the biggest weakness of the MCL34, watching them as third best team in S3 today is very encouraging since now we are not only trying to maximize the strengths of the car (last year the focus was on low drag races and not expecting good performance in tracks with a lot of slow corners)
We should also note that Ferrari run a very low drag configuration with Leclerc (therefore their performance in S1, S2) while Mclaren seems to have focus more on Race Pace
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202008 ... c80e13.jpg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
1'26.079
Contrary to popular belief, I don’t think Mclaren will struggle much integrating the Mercedes PU, unless the car concept is seriously compromised by the different layout... At least from a mechanical perspective, the team is already working on the integration plan and wouldn’t expect too many surprises in that regard.Xero wrote:Mercedes have clearly made a large step with their PU this year, not ready to believe all 3 teams made a similar jump in chassis/aero performance. They were lagging behind Ferrari the past couple of seasons in terms of power output and must have pushed a lot of resources into developing it to close the gap. This year though, with the Ferrari PU severely hampered by undoing whatever trickery they were doing, Mercedes are reaping the rewards of those developments.
Great news is we should get a fairly good indication of that when McLaren bolt it into their car next season, albeit without any compromised integration.
I agree, don't think it will cause any issues either. It's all pure speculation, but a 4 or 5 tenths gain isn't outside the realm of possibility. Would definitely put them into the podium mix. First things first, the car needs to continue on it's strong development path. Expecting Ferrari and Red Bull to make massive progress over the course of this season, McLaren need to match that.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 19:03Contrary to popular belief, I don’t think Mclaren will struggle much integrating the Mercedes PU, unless the car concept is seriously compromised by the different layout... At least from a mechanical perspective, the team is already working on the integration plan and wouldn’t expect too many surprises in that regard.
The Mercedes step will be carry over to next year with potential additional performance if they upgrade it between seasons (which is to be expected)... It will be interesting to watch what Mclaren can accomplish with the best PU on the grid... If they can maintain or shorten the gaps to RBR, Ferrari and RP this season, the could finally be in a position to fight for podiums in 2021... Fighting Mercedes is impossible though.