godlameroso wrote: ↑03 Aug 2020, 01:51
Average difference over the whole race, being able to go faster in one lap is different than being able to all race. Bottas made sure Hamilton wasn't cruising, Bottas had to, he's driving for his job.
Bill wrote: ↑03 Aug 2020, 08:48
...here Max was only 8 seconds behind and just managing his pace while Lewis and Bottas were pushing each other according to them.
I wonder if this is more down to what people mean by 'cruising'.
For me, it applies to the package as a whole. For others, it may apply simply to the driver. Or just the car.
If Mercedes turns everything down and sets a target number of laps to complete, the drivers can still be 'pushing like crazy' but it is no indication of the actual pace of the package as a whole.
SF Engineer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2020, 12:46
If that was significantly faster there is a fair chance they would have gone that route.
Why? What benefit was there to going faster?
SF Engineer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2020, 12:46
Either it would not have been, or they need to preserve the life of the engines by turning them down during the races (as to not use additional items incurring penalties later in the season, or for fuel economy, etc.) was prioritized....it seems that other aspects are limiting the application of such pace for the entirety of the race.
If you have the option of either stressing components unnecessarily, or not stressing them, which is the most logical approach?
There doesn't have to be a '
need to preserve life', there just has to be a fractional theoretical advantage. And there is. Hamilton has scored points in 71 out of 72 of the last races. He (and Mercedes) achieve that by taking the minimum out of the components whenever possible. Why increase the risk of a component failing during a race when the only pay off is an even bigger time margin?
In the current championship, the 'other aspects limiting the application of such pace for the entirety of the rest of the race' is that the rest of the field are, sadly, too slow.