godlameroso wrote:SmallSoldier wrote: ↑24 Sep 2020, 15:28
Wouter wrote:
Last week you got the same question from me twice as above in a PM.
You may not remember, but then I also got an evasive answer.
If you post information here that only the people at Honda know, I would like to know if you got that information from Honda itself. Also now on the forum you don't answer my question, which is basically the same as those two in my PMs.
It may be that you delete your PM messages immediately, so I will now send you my PM again from last week, then you can see that even then, after my second time, you still did not answer. Just as I did not receive an answer to my question on the forum yesterday:
"How do you get this information from the past two weeks? Honda hasn't announced anything at all yet."
Hopefully you now do remember and it is a little clearer to you.
You also sent me a PM on Jan 25, 2020 telling me that you live in Miami and work with people from Honda like 3 or 4 months of the year, and that you hear things, talk to people and they tell you stuff (your words).
That is why I would like to know if you have inside information this time too.
He “speculates” about things, the problem is that he states them as facts... A lot of misinformation unluckily
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Hmm, I don't recall being off the mark too often. Maybe a few weather predictions don't pan out, maybe I'm a few tenths off predicting qualifying times? Maybe I'm a bit off with predicting a car's relative performance? Seriously I'd like to know what misinformation I'm spreading. You Mercedes fanbois are too....liberal.
Don’t make it about politics... And I don’t want to derail the RBR - Honda discussion, but you have a tendency to:
A) State your opinions as “facts” when they aren’t backed by any factual information
B) Use made up “numbers” to support your statements, therefore giving the impression that you have factual information that you actually don’t have.
C) Defending your positions, by arguing that they can’t be proven wrong, instead of proving why they are right.
The fact that Wouter has asked you in one more than one occasion for your “sources” and you can’t bring one up is something that is most often than not the case (for example, the Honda engine problems, where you categorically state that the issues at Monza and Mugello aren’t related, when you don’t have any information beyond your suspicion that they aren’t)... Debating your opinions would be great, but as soon as you state yours as facts instead of opinions, there is no possibility for a meaningful discussion.
The saddest part is that you have to resort to childish insults as “You Mercedes Fanbois”.
I’ll leave it there... Have a great day
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk