I read this one too. I think this article is bullshit. Just the words of someone twisting already available knowledge and spewing his own crap out of it.FDD wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 01:36"The new thermal engine is already giving about fifteen horsepower more than the "deflated" unit of 2020 and the goal is to reach thirty before the homologation date thanks to the introduction of a new intercooler and the improvement of the hybrid with an MGU-K that will be able to increase the delivery time of electric power over the lap."
These all is speculations according to me, I want only to present what is published for members of the forum to have better insight let's say...ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 06:22I read this one too. I think this article is bullshit. Just the words of someone twisting already available knowledge and spewing his own crap out of it.FDD wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 01:36"The new thermal engine is already giving about fifteen horsepower more than the "deflated" unit of 2020 and the goal is to reach thirty before the homologation date thanks to the introduction of a new intercooler and the improvement of the hybrid with an MGU-K that will be able to increase the delivery time of electric power over the lap."
I do not understand nothing about new ICE and it is hardly that any of us will understand very much in near future.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?
Ofc, I didn't mean to say anything rude to you, its just Georgio piola is so very frustrating at times. He starts with hard facts in that article (facts verified by binotto or atleast aligned with other sites) and then, towards the end he goes into some of his own tangentsFDD wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 17:46These all is speculations according to me, I want only to present what is published for members of the forum to have better insight let's say...ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 06:22I read this one too. I think this article is bullshit. Just the words of someone twisting already available knowledge and spewing his own crap out of it.FDD wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 01:36"The new thermal engine is already giving about fifteen horsepower more than the "deflated" unit of 2020 and the goal is to reach thirty before the homologation date thanks to the introduction of a new intercooler and the improvement of the hybrid with an MGU-K that will be able to increase the delivery time of electric power over the lap."
Binotto told that they are aiming to finish 3rd behind Mercedes and Redbull next season. A power increase of only 30 hp would not go hand in hand with this aim I'd say.FDD wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 01:36"The new thermal engine is already giving about fifteen horsepower more than the "deflated" unit of 2020 and the goal is to reach thirty before the homologation date thanks to the introduction of a new intercooler and the improvement of the hybrid with an MGU-K that will be able to increase the delivery time of electric power over the lap."
I am fully aware that u did not mean to say anything rude to meryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 19:23Ofc, I didn't mean to say anything rude to you, its just Georgio piola is so very frustrating at times. He starts with hard facts in that article (facts verified by binotto or atleast aligned with other sites) and then, towards the end he goes into some of his own tangents
Reducing the size of the turbine means more backpressure and more runaway boost pressure aka boost creep as well. Which would require more aggressive MGU-H harvesting, especially if you choose to not run a wastegate.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?
I think Ferrari is planning to blow the wastegates (I think they'll have 2 instead of the 1 in 2020) just like Redbull does. More backpressure means more wastegating.godlameroso wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 20:49Reducing the size of the turbine means more backpressure and more runaway boost pressure aka boost creep as well. Which would require more aggressive MGU-H harvesting, especially if you choose to not run a wastegate.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?
That's rubbish, the turbine size will not be decreased. They lack ICE power. So it should be the same or bigger next year. They will have more than enough to provide the MGUH when the ICE improves. No need to sacrifice any ICE power with a small turbine.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?
Didnt Binotto himself say that Ferrari are reducing the turbine size to increase efficiency?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Jan 2021, 05:48That's rubbish, the turbine size will not be decreased. They lack ICE power. So it should be the same or bigger next year. They will have more than enough to provide the MGUH when the ICE improves. No need to sacrifice any ICE power with a small turbine.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?
Reducing parasitics is like gaining power.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Jan 2021, 05:48That's rubbish, the turbine size will not be decreased. They lack ICE power. So it should be the same or bigger next year. They will have more than enough to provide the MGUH when the ICE improves. No need to sacrifice any ICE power with a small turbine.ryaan2904 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 09:58What I don't understand about the new PU is why decrease the turbine size? Also, does the decrease in turbine size mean a decrease in compressor size too?
In the Honda thread, its been discussed already how honda uses the ICE to charge the batteries. Ferrari itself used the extra ICE power back in 2019 to increase deployment/recovery via MGU H.
If the 'superfast' combustion system already saves you fuel, why not use the saved fuel to charge the battery and subsequently address the turbo-lag?