Translated by Google from hereMercedes F1 was once again extremely dominant in 2020.
While expected to be a year when Red Bull Racing and Max Verstappen could finally fight against the Germans for the championship, James Allison actually reveals that his team didn't have to push much on the aerodynamic side.
"We stopped earlier than usual. Because of confinement, we have also lost seven weeks of time in the wind tunnel. A tough season normally about 35 weeks so we had already one-fifth less time," says the technical director.
But the data was so good that Mercedes F1 chose from mid-July to focus on 2021 F1, the W12 (which could also be called W11B).
“In fact, our last aerodynamic development for the W11 was completed in mid-July, a month and a half ahead of schedule for our 2020 F1 development. The latest developments were produced in time for Spa . "
"In total, we had three developments in 2020. The first in Austria, then at Silverstone and finally the smallest at Spa. All of this allowed us to devote more time than expected to our F1 in 2021. Unfortunately we had to have to wait until January 1 to start exploring 2022 F1."
“The 2019 car was an excellent racing car, but it was a little harder to put it in pole position. There were reasons for that. As for our car, it was difficult to get the front axle sharp enough.” A quote from James Allison confirming Hamilton’s comments.nico5 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2020, 20:19Hungary 2019 is a tricky one. I think they set up the car to protect the rears in the race, so Merc ended up having more pace than RB in race trim than in qualy, something that hardly ever happened throughout 2019 and 2020. Of course, going in that direction means loading the rear and having an undesteery car with new tires, hence the less rotation. Might not be the only reason and for sure they might have made steps forward in that department as well, but I was just pointing out that certainly wasn't Merc's weakness in comparison to the other frontrunners in 2019. And that's how you measure what is one's weakness in F1, where everything is relative.Sharnlarry wrote: ↑31 Dec 2020, 11:54If you look at turn 1 in Hungary 2019 for example the car didn’t rotate as well as the red bull as the front was lazy in qualifying trim. Looking at this years pole lap in Hungary the car gets to the apex way quicker that it did last year. Hamilton very much understands car performance and even though the car was good in low speed corners relative to the rest of the field it still had weaknesses so I don’t find anything in the article inaccurate.nico5 wrote: ↑27 Dec 2020, 18:44
It makes me laugh because the difference (EDIT: obviously in Merc's favour) in turn in (or rotation) at low speed between Merc and the rest of the grid we saw last year at tracks like Barcelona S3 or China or Monaco, not just visually but data-based, was as big as it's ever been. So either Hamilton understands nothing about car performance, which I struggle to believe for he's a great driver and a clever one, or they really can go on record and come up with whatever they wanna say and people are still gonna believe them.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... ybrid_era/zibby43 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2021, 02:08https://preview.redd.it/vfvy7t4zop861. ... e20980ad14
Evolution of the nose.
Nope:Duke wrote: ↑03 Jan 2021, 12:07Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... ybrid_era/zibby43 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2021, 02:08https://preview.redd.it/vfvy7t4zop861. ... e20980ad14
Evolution of the nose.
What was the upgrade for silverstone, weight reduction?Morteza wrote: ↑02 Jan 2021, 17:16Translated by Google from hereMercedes F1 was once again extremely dominant in 2020.
While expected to be a year when Red Bull Racing and Max Verstappen could finally fight against the Germans for the championship, James Allison actually reveals that his team didn't have to push much on the aerodynamic side.
"We stopped earlier than usual. Because of confinement, we have also lost seven weeks of time in the wind tunnel. A tough season normally about 35 weeks so we had already one-fifth less time," says the technical director.
But the data was so good that Mercedes F1 chose from mid-July to focus on 2021 F1, the W12 (which could also be called W11B).
“In fact, our last aerodynamic development for the W11 was completed in mid-July, a month and a half ahead of schedule for our 2020 F1 development. The latest developments were produced in time for Spa . "
"In total, we had three developments in 2020. The first in Austria, then at Silverstone and finally the smallest at Spa. All of this allowed us to devote more time than expected to our F1 in 2021. Unfortunately we had to have to wait until January 1 to start exploring 2022 F1."
Mercedes reveals having completed its aerodnamic developments in mid-July
Have to agree, every year since then it’s become increasingly...phallic, though nowhere near as bad as some of the 2014 noses.
This is a great picture that shows the difference between these two teams. Notice the difference in size of the transmission case it's nothing major by itself, it's not just the suspension being moved up. It's how much thinner the Mercedes transmission is than the Williams. Williams needs to make it that thick to make it strong enough, the Mercedes is much thinner at the critical aero area.Blackout wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 09:55I've noticed in 2019 that Merc has raised the pull rod assembly a lot as you know. But now i think I understand why, it's probably also for aero reasons too and it serves the same purpose as their 2020 'reversed lower whishbone. The front wishbone arm AND the pull rod have been completely cleared out of the way "to get high energy air down to a part of the car that loves high energy air" Allison.
https://i.imgur.com/hqAs5EJ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/p1LWfG2.jpg
I mean, surely a big part of why they found it difficult to put on pole was that Ferrari had a massively powerful quali mode? I think that’s kinda implied when Allison says “there were reasons for that...as for *our* car”.Sharnlarry wrote: ↑02 Jan 2021, 18:16“The 2019 car was an excellent racing car, but it was a little harder to put it in pole position. There were reasons for that. As for our car, it was difficult to get the front axle sharp enough.” A quote from James Allison confirming Hamilton’s comments.nico5 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2020, 20:19Hungary 2019 is a tricky one. I think they set up the car to protect the rears in the race, so Merc ended up having more pace than RB in race trim than in qualy, something that hardly ever happened throughout 2019 and 2020. Of course, going in that direction means loading the rear and having an undesteery car with new tires, hence the less rotation. Might not be the only reason and for sure they might have made steps forward in that department as well, but I was just pointing out that certainly wasn't Merc's weakness in comparison to the other frontrunners in 2019. And that's how you measure what is one's weakness in F1, where everything is relative.Sharnlarry wrote: ↑31 Dec 2020, 11:54
If you look at turn 1 in Hungary 2019 for example the car didn’t rotate as well as the red bull as the front was lazy in qualifying trim. Looking at this years pole lap in Hungary the car gets to the apex way quicker that it did last year. Hamilton very much understands car performance and even though the car was good in low speed corners relative to the rest of the field it still had weaknesses so I don’t find anything in the article inaccurate.