Ferrari SF21

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
bosyber
bosyber
45
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 22:41

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Did anyone post this picture (yeah tweet, but with interpretation of picture) yet?

C Plinius Secundus
C Plinius Secundus
7
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 21:06

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Mr.G wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:19
mantaque wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:11
Mr.G wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:07

The end is defined by rules, so they must to comply...
Like with everything, but I just wonder what advantage you gain with this design.
They can have thinner pipe = less weight, then the rules define it must be wider for the last few cm, so they changed the diameter back...
I think that internal packaging might be a more probable reason, thinner pipe, less bulk

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Looks like they touched everything.

This is great, as it would be amazing to see 10 different winners this season!

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:26
Mr.G wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:19
mantaque wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:11


Like with everything, but I just wonder what advantage you gain with this design.
They can have thinner pipe = less weight, then the rules define it must be wider for the last few cm, so they changed the diameter back...
I think that internal packaging might be a more probable reason, thinner pipe, less bulk
The wastegate pipe causes its own bulge in the engine cover. Maybe it was done like this to minimize that needed bulge?

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Image

Image

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Definitely not the best angles to compare, but good enough for quick visualisation. Ferrari doesn't look too shabby in those areas in comparison to Mercedes...

Image
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

The sidepods work looks interesting, there are a nice amount of changes here and there, which explains why Binotto was so bussy in the last part of the season. Not a great changes in the nose but with the limited amount of tokens to use I can understand that they considered that other areas would benefit them a lot more. We will see if they have done the right thing.

Only with the power improvement in the PU the car should a lot more competitive than in 2020 but Ferrari is unpredictable, usually in the bad sense of the term.

C Plinius Secundus
C Plinius Secundus
7
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 21:06

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Zynerji wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:28
C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:26
Mr.G wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:19


They can have thinner pipe = less weight, then the rules define it must be wider for the last few cm, so they changed the diameter back...
I think that internal packaging might be a more probable reason, thinner pipe, less bulk
The wastegate pipe causes its own bulge in the engine cover. Maybe it was done like this to minimize that needed bulge?
Yes, it could be another reason. They have (apparently) changed the turbo, for some reason they didn't (or couldn't) remove the wastegape pipe altogether, so perhaps they use a smaller section pipe to pack it more tightly... every milimeter counts...

bosyber
bosyber
45
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 22:41

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:42
Zynerji wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:28
C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:26

I think that internal packaging might be a more probable reason, thinner pipe, less bulk
The wastegate pipe causes its own bulge in the engine cover. Maybe it was done like this to minimize that needed bulge?
Yes, it could be another reason. They have (apparently) changed the turbo, for some reason they didn't (or couldn't) remove the wastegape pipe altogether, so perhaps they use a smaller section pipe to pack it more tightly... every milimeter counts...
The wastegate pipe exit isn't the only thing prescribed, they also are required to have a wastegate, which indeed means they cannot get rid of the piping either :)

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

wowgr8 wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 15:22
Blackout wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 14:41
It's weird to see Ferrari, the inventor of this type of sidepod intakes in 2017, 'abandoning' their typical design to copy that of other teams....
The sidepod bodywork is completely different too and it adopts the redbulian downwashy style.
Complete break with what they've been doing since... phew
Abandoning their design what do you mean? Since 2017 they've just evolved the lower SIPS design further and further. 2019 to 2020 there was the change where they got rid of the intake on the top side of the sidepod but what you see today is just ultra tight engine cover/sidepods with that Red Bull style crease, it's a natural evolution IMO, most of the grid following that Mercedes sloping sidepod thing they did with the W10
There is " " around "abondeoning".
I'm talking about he intake shapes.
-
Since 2017 they've just evolved the lower SIPS design further and further
But they retained a Ferrari style.
Now they have the RB style
Image
Last edited by Blackout on 10 Mar 2021, 16:49, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:42
Zynerji wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:28
C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:26

I think that internal packaging might be a more probable reason, thinner pipe, less bulk
The wastegate pipe causes its own bulge in the engine cover. Maybe it was done like this to minimize that needed bulge?
Yes, it could be another reason. They have (apparently) changed the turbo, for some reason they didn't (or couldn't) remove the wastegape pipe altogether, so perhaps they use a smaller section pipe to pack it more tightly... every milimeter counts...
it's all the things together... less weight = smaller part = less bulky = more space for other stuff = less heat...

btw SF1000 already have this, but this time it looks like they go another step in this direction...

Image Image
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

C Plinius Secundus
C Plinius Secundus
7
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 21:06

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

bosyber wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:44
C Plinius Secundus wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:42
Zynerji wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 16:28


The wastegate pipe causes its own bulge in the engine cover. Maybe it was done like this to minimize that needed bulge?
Yes, it could be another reason. They have (apparently) changed the turbo, for some reason they didn't (or couldn't) remove the wastegape pipe altogether, so perhaps they use a smaller section pipe to pack it more tightly... every milimeter counts...
The wastegate pipe exit isn't the only thing prescribed, they also are required to have a wastegate, which indeed means they cannot get rid of the piping either :)
Interesting, but, hasn't Mercedes gone "sans pipe" on their W12 for example? I'm a little confused... #-o

FDD
FDD
81
Joined: 29 Mar 2019, 01:08

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

cplchanb wrote:
10 Mar 2021, 15:55
How can they not use any tokens for the nose??? It's been modified quite heavily similar to alfa Romeo.
It looks like that structural part (which is under "token regulation") is not touched only the aero environment of it.

aerofoilf1
aerofoilf1
247
Joined: 05 Mar 2021, 13:38

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Front wing and front brake duct compare

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Ferrari SF21

Post

Nicolas Carpentiers wrote:Apart from the different geometry (front element of the top wishbone seems to attach further forward to gearbox), there is something new in this area, see yellow. Not sure what is it. Aero device (it was part of the bodywork in 2020) or mechanical one (but what)?
Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare