I wouldn't be so sure of that, its roughly the same position and lighting as this photo that was for sure taken today.
I wouldn't be so sure of that, its roughly the same position and lighting as this photo that was for sure taken today.
I'm sure of that. Here an article from Marc 13. And there is the same picture.
Point is moot anyway, clearly they "tested" [filmed] today, although the device on the rear wing wasn't necessarily there.balalev wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 22:34I'm sure of that. Here an article from Marc 13. And there is the same picture.
https://www.diariomotor.com/competicion ... porada-f1/
Or another from Marc 12.
https://f1vilag.hu/hirek/bottas-nekunk- ... -autonkat/
That's a lot of "ifs". Guys, honestly, this doesn't make much sense. In a year with highly restricted testing, homologated parts, wind tunnel/CFD restrictions for Merc (due to finishing 1st), juggling with 2022 development, and most of all budget caps, why would Mercedes go to such EXTREME lengths to hide something? If anything, hiding is probably counter-productive this year given competitors have limited ability, and perhaps appetite, to copy.cheeRS wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 23:09Point is moot anyway, clearly they "tested" [filmed] today, although the device on the rear wing wasn't necessarily there.balalev wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 22:34I'm sure of that. Here an article from Marc 13. And there is the same picture.
https://www.diariomotor.com/competicion ... porada-f1/
Or another from Marc 12.
https://f1vilag.hu/hirek/bottas-nekunk- ... -autonkat/
Unless there are photos to the contrary, it's clear that Merc is hiding something on the rear area of the W12. Can't wait to find out. If that's true, and it does work well, AND it requires tokens to change [not purely aero], Merc might have played their cards really, really, strongly.
They don't have to be hiding it. it could be just like 2019 when they wanted to spend as much time as possible working on the components they would run for the first few races.
mkay wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 23:17For the exact reason in my highly hypothetical premise. Suppose it's something that works really well, but is simple. Something that doesn't necessarily require a ton of on-track time to validate when there are chassis dynos, sims, wind tunnels, and CFD. At least enough to justify not having it shown in on-track testing. In that case, if they did go to testing with it on the car, all of the other teams could replicate it, even if it requires tokens, up to the start of the season if I am not mistaken. Didn't Haas not even use tokens for this year (might be wrong)?cheeRS wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 23:09That's a lot of "ifs". Guys, honestly, this doesn't make much sense. In a year with highly restricted testing, homologated parts, wind tunnel/CFD restrictions for Merc (due to finishing 1st), juggling with 2022 development, and most of all budget caps, why would Mercedes go to such EXTREME lengths to hide something? If anything, hiding is probably counter-productive this year given competitors have limited ability, and perhaps appetite, to copy.balalev wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 22:34
Unless there are photos to the contrary, it's clear that Merc is hiding something on the rear area of the W12. Can't wait to find out. If that's true, and it does work well, AND it requires tokens to change [not purely aero], Merc might have played their cards really, really, strongly.
Also, why run the risk of the part(s) not functioning as planned on race weekend?
If they can hide it until homoligation starts, they win. In reality this isn't that far fetched. They sort of did this in 2019 with a highly highly revised car for Australia, although the token system wasn't as strict as now.
Besides, the reason we're speculating is because of what James Allison said vs what we all see. He basically teased big changes, none of which can be seen. If there is a published article that is reputable that can prove what Merc spent their tokens on, I'll gladly read it.
Some better pics (screen grabs via @ScarbsTech):cheeRS wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 22:07Could be, but it’s odd that the “object” is there throughout all the frames of the video, whereas reflections typically change with motion. Hard to tell.zibby43 wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 21:25I think that’s just a reflection on the red paint there. Lighting is a tricky.cheeRS wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 21:06If you pause the video and skim through, the car looks different - and it looks like there is another bulge above the lower plenum/power bulge that Allison talks about. What is this? I thought it was the camera/wing that is mounted near the airbox inlet, but it's not.
https://ibb.co/X8xBBTV
https://twitter.com/MercedesAMGF1/statu ... 51659?s=20
It's a reflection that isn't present throughout all the frames. Right at the end of the pitstop, just before the car sprints off, this "object" disappears.
Yeah, much better photos - you're right and I was mistaken.
Have they modified the device at the edge of the floor infront of the rear tyre?
If I had a dollar for every time lighting in one of these photos has tripped me up, I’d own an F1 team.
Difficult to tell with that resolution. Wish we had an illustrate function on this platform.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2021, 01:50Have they modified the device at the edge of the floor infront of the rear tyre?
You're forgetting that several components won't become homogenized until they hit the track for P1. Thus even if it was easy to copy you can't copy it anymore, because you used your own design during P1. For example all the aerodynamic components of the suspension system front and rear fall into this category.