#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
The sidepod width (white separator on your drawing) really looked a lot shorter than on the rs20. Maybe it looks like it because they removed some of the vertical strakes on the side.Blackout wrote: ↑04 Apr 2021, 22:51Still trying to understand the 2021 cooling changes
It looks like the 2021 sidepod cooling ensemble (radiator + intercooler) has a more rounded shape, so the 2020 one has a straighter outer edge and a more rectangular shape
The drawing depicts the top view : P
So the 2021 sidepod cooling surface isnt necessarily smaller, it's primarily a different shape IMO
https://i.imgur.com/binqsnb.jpg
motorsport.com - nextgen-auto.com
https://i.imgur.com/iHmgz6O.jpg
It's like the difference between the 2019 and the 2019 cooling, where the 2019 intercooler looked more rectangular than the 2018 one
https://i.imgur.com/c1tQ3jB.jpg
It's because the RS20 has a different kind of sideopods compared to the A521 or RS.19. It has RB-style sidepods where the widest section of the sidepod bottom is elongated or even swept backwards, compared to 'classic' undercut sidepods, like in this RB-13/RS.19 (exaggerated) floor comparison
What is the benefit of reverting to the previous design?Blackout wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 09:10It's because the RS20 has a different kind of sideopods compared to the A521 or RS.19. It has RB-style sidepods where the widest section of the sidepod bottom is elongated or even swept backwards, compared to 'classic' undercut sidepods, like in this RB-13/RS.19 (exaggerated) floor comparison
https://i.imgur.com/8rQXCRI.png
https://i.imgur.com/l5qUNfg.jpg
I think they combined the 2. They kept the downwash and added the undercut back in. You'll notice they even added a flaring to the halo in 2021 to help downwash.JordanMugen wrote: ↑08 Apr 2021, 16:05What is the benefit of reverting to the previous design?Blackout wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 09:10It's because the RS20 has a different kind of sideopods compared to the A521 or RS.19. It has RB-style sidepods where the widest section of the sidepod bottom is elongated or even swept backwards, compared to 'classic' undercut sidepods, like in this RB-13/RS.19 (exaggerated) floor comparison
https://i.imgur.com/8rQXCRI.png
https://i.imgur.com/l5qUNfg.jpg
It seems very strange for Alpine to choose the classical undercut, when nearly every single other team has chosen the overcut downwash sidepods!?
Totally agree , they look like they have no idea about where to improve , CoG wins over aero each time !JordanMugen wrote: ↑08 Apr 2021, 16:05What is the benefit of reverting to the previous design?Blackout wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 09:10It's because the RS20 has a different kind of sideopods compared to the A521 or RS.19. It has RB-style sidepods where the widest section of the sidepod bottom is elongated or even swept backwards, compared to 'classic' undercut sidepods, like in this RB-13/RS.19 (exaggerated) floor comparison
https://i.imgur.com/8rQXCRI.png
https://i.imgur.com/l5qUNfg.jpg
It seems very strange for Alpine to choose the classical undercut, when nearly every single other team has chosen the overcut downwash sidepods!?
They tested and compared both sidepod styles for sure.JordanMugen wrote: ↑08 Apr 2021, 16:05What is the benefit of reverting to the previous design?Blackout wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 09:10It's because the RS20 has a different kind of sideopods compared to the A521 or RS.19. It has RB-style sidepods where the widest section of the sidepod bottom is elongated or even swept backwards, compared to 'classic' undercut sidepods, like in this RB-13/RS.19 (exaggerated) floor comparison
https://i.imgur.com/8rQXCRI.png
https://i.imgur.com/l5qUNfg.jpg
It seems very strange for Alpine to choose the classical undercut, when nearly every single other team has chosen the overcut downwash sidepods!?
Every F1 project is cost driven, and teams turned to 2022 , anyway other teams didn't suffer as renault , and lesser budget ones! Alpine has quite difficult times to cope with, especially over aero as a whole !IMO the last Enstone-Viry projects are very cost-driven, more than their main opponents. They clearly wanna spend the least amount of ressources on these cars and focus on 2022.
That's why many parts are carryovers and are quite old. Covid and the freeze have exacerbated this.
I think it's what blackout said. It isn't a can't it's they haven't invested the time and money.
diffuser wrote: ↑09 Apr 2021, 22:07I think it's what blackout said. It isn't a can't it's they haven't invested the time and money.
I mean if they would have brought the 2022 PU with a front compressor in this year and they could have done whatever.
Exhausts are tuned to specific lengths but they don't have to be on the side of the ICE.
RBR tuck them in under the ICE.