It’s just a flier, but I don’t think RBR have nearly as good tire deg as Merc. I think the RBR is slightly faster in every metric, but Merc are ahead on tire wear on the racing compounds.MKlaus wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021, 10:29one need to take into account the floor damage for max, which cost him a tenth.zibby43 wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021, 06:51Here is an interesting article from F1 analyzing Max and Lewis' qualifying laps:
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... 0OnAd.html
Some informative excerpts:
2. Hamilton makes a mistake into Turn 10 which costs him approximately 0.3s to Verstappen. The balance of the Mercedes seems to be towards oversteer, as represented by Hamilton making several steering corrections.
3. Hamilton is using a different energy deployment strategy to Verstappen, stopping the deployment much earlier on the straights.
With the gap to pole ending up .388, the mistake made by Lewis suggests that the delta was potentially much closer because of the 3 tenths lost by Lewis.
On the subject of tire degradation, the Merc was very impressive in the final stint. Of course, it must be taken into account that Verstappen had a shorter final stint, and was able to push the tires harder.
https://www.formula1.com/content/dam/fo ... /image.png
on the tyre degradation part, as usual mercedes biases their setup towards harder compounds which means, a good tyre life in race and better strategic options for longer stints. but then it hurts qualifying as the car isn't optimized for softer compounds. it's hard to say where the differences are between rb and merc due to difference in compromises.
Not only has Horner alluded to “impressive” deg by Merc, James Allison today insinuated that it looks like RBR are very keen to avoid longer stint lengths from what they’ve seen so far this year.