Good analysis from Palmer and he explains very well why verstappen couldn't re overtake ham at 8:20 of video.
https://verstappen.com/en/article/4327/“It was such a bummer,” Jos starts. “We had the car to win, everyone saw that. It’s just that strategically Mercedes did an excellent job in Bahrain. Everyone, including us, assumed Hamilton would opt for the three-stop strategy. If you are in second place, you can take the risk of going for a longer third stint. If you don’t, you know for sure you’ll come in second. And should you fail, you’re still second, Bottas couldn’t keep up and Perez wasn’t behind as defense.”
Jos is optimistic though: “The good thing this year is that we know that we can fight again for first place in the next race. We haven’t been in this position these last few years.”
Jos isn’t afraid that Mercedes will catch up in the next three weeks: “We’re not sleeping on the job either.
We are awake too and I know what’s coming up regarding development."
“We’re ready for it. It’s going to be an incredibly thrilling year. I’m sure of it.”
Is AN not more of a consultant role in RBT now? I thought they had their previous 3 “heads” of aero/chassis/design etc now workinf as a triad of sorts and Newey just being a guiding voiceJust_a_fan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2021, 10:21Newey isn't a God* and no one designs a whole car in F1 these days. Newey will set the overall idea and maybe has a hand in certain aspects but much is designed and detailed by a team of others. Maybe Mercedes's "team of others" is just better than Red Bull's "team of others".
What will be interesting is to see what happens as people move around the paddock. Watch where the talent goes and see how teams' fortunes change.
(* Newey isn't a God but he's definitely serious F1 Designer Royalty)
Quite a strange way of looking at it (if I interpret this correctly as meaning something along the lines of the RB16B being "just" a minor tidy-yp of the RB16, but the main thing is that Mercedes were hamstrung by the regulation changes - maybe you didn't mean that, but it sort of reads that way to me).
How-so, why-so Godlameroso..? Didn’t Slo Poke merely predict racing at the front this year?
Yes he did, and it's pretty darn cool. Yeah, Hamilton is pretty good at extending his stints, so yeah, he had some good outlaps, he took some life out of the engine to do that, let's see how it plays out over the season.
One major teething issue I thought I’d seen, was the signing of young master Perez. Extremely Pleased I was wrong about him! The presence of mind to reboot the car, first lap, first race for a new to him team is not to be sniffed at. His overtaking was equally impressive also.godlameroso wrote: ↑04 Apr 2021, 01:58Yes he did, and it's pretty darn cool. Yeah, Hamilton is pretty good at extending his stints, so yeah, he had some good outlaps, he took some life out of the engine to do that, let's see how it plays out over the season.
Teething issues I can live with.
In the Honda documentary, it was said Newey personally thanked Honda for the new PU that made the RB16b a better car to design aerodynamically. So don't listen to the trolls too much, team Red Bull Honda knows what's up.raymondu999 wrote: ↑03 Apr 2021, 16:56Is AN not more of a consultant role in RBT now? I thought they had their previous 3 “heads” of aero/chassis/design etc now workinf as a triad of sorts and Newey just being a guiding voiceJust_a_fan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2021, 10:21Newey isn't a God* and no one designs a whole car in F1 these days. Newey will set the overall idea and maybe has a hand in certain aspects but much is designed and detailed by a team of others. Maybe Mercedes's "team of others" is just better than Red Bull's "team of others".
What will be interesting is to see what happens as people move around the paddock. Watch where the talent goes and see how teams' fortunes change.
(* Newey isn't a God but he's definitely serious F1 Designer Royalty)
the regulations change intended to cut 10% downforce from the car, which is anywhere from 1 second to 1.5 seconds and they increased the tyre size by 3 kgs, which is worth a tenth of two. it makes the cumulative losses (on the higher scale) around 1.7 seconds.bigblue wrote: ↑04 Apr 2021, 00:49Quite a strange way of looking at it (if I interpret this correctly as meaning something along the lines of the RB16B being "just" a minor tidy-yp of the RB16, but the main thing is that Mercedes were hamstrung by the regulation changes - maybe you didn't mean that, but it sort of reads that way to me).
Everyone regressed due to the regulation changes. The challenge was then to advance again from that. So maybe Red Bull just did a better job over winter. On the other hand, maybe the above interpretation is right, and the changes hit Mercedes harder than Red Bull and so they were disadvantaged more, and despite gaining a similar amount they still lost out. You'd also have to factor in that they also started from a better position before the changes.
If nothing else, Honda seem to have made a massive effort that incudes packaging enhancements, which helps to allow the redesigned rear end of the RB16B, so there's quite a lot of work there alone from both car and engine.