Again that's over regulation in my opinion. We used to have customer cars, and teams didn't have to compete in every race of the season.Tizz wrote: ↑23 Apr 2021, 20:39It is a difficult call whether or not this will this will be cheaper in the end and requires profound knowledge of the production costs. It used to be like that but I think they left this strategy when teams in financial trouble did no longer have parts for the wings, the gearbox and so on and hardly could participate at all.dans79 wrote: ↑23 Apr 2021, 20:33I think the bigger issue is the over regulation of the sport. The RULes have pushed everyone into exorbitantly expensive R&D, with the need for everything to be as reliable as possible, efficient as possible.
in my personal opinion stuff would be much cheaper if we went back to everything only needing to last a weekend, with a dose of common sense. active aero and suspension would also most likely drastically reduce cost.
Maybe so, but it were different times. There were more cars than places on the grid. In recent times there have been many occasions where it was unsure whether or not there would be a decent number of cars on the grid. TV broadcasters require a number of cars and a number of races. Formula1 and the sponsors require the teams participate in all the races. It is the legacy of Bernie Ecclestone.
Yeah, that's the underlying problem Bernie's constant need to maximize profits at all costs. He slowly cut off his nose to spite his face!Tizz wrote: ↑23 Apr 2021, 20:53Maybe so, but it were different times. There were more cars than places on the grid. In recent times there have been many occasions where it was unsure whether or not there would be a decent number of cars on the grid. TV broadcasters require a number of cars and a number of races. Formula1 and the sponsors require the teams participate in all the races. It is the legacy of Bernie Ecclestone.
Totally agree. Also, Lewis' demeanour this season, particularly after that last race, seems happier than he's seemed in a while. I think he's relishing the challenge this season and will stick around for a few more.LHamilton wrote: ↑20 Apr 2021, 15:17Personally I don't get this "Hamilton might retire this season" talk. I for one would be really suprised if he did. Hamilton has time and time again said that he wants to battle other people. And having a few seasons and races where that hasn't happend as often as he probably would've liked, he could very well be looking at the new rules and be thinking that would be a good chance of that changing for two reasons. (1) The gap closing between teams, and (2) the possibility of closer battles due to the new regulations promoting the capacity to stay closer to the car ahead in dirty air.214270 wrote: ↑20 Apr 2021, 12:51Absolutely no chance this is his final season if he’s that invested.DarthPlagueisTheVise wrote: ↑20 Apr 2021, 11:34Lewis is testing the 18 inch wheels. Looks super dope imo.
On top of the regulation changes to the car we get new tyres, which most likely will behave differently. So 2022 will be a big change and a new learning curve. And for someone like Hamilton who's been in F1 for a long time, that might also be a breath of fresh air and re-motivate him to go on (if that was an issue for him).
So I'm thinking that he will give the new rules a go and see where that leads. One year, maybe two. If it doesn't satisfy him, he will likely retire after that.
The runs are more about gathering as much data as possible, then trying to set the fastest lap times.MKlaus wrote: ↑25 Apr 2021, 16:02extended video of the test. those tyres seems ultra slow. atleast that's what appears to the naked eye without any graphics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Gm0t_DlPQ
I think the biggest step they will take, will be being able to switch on the softer compounds without sacrificing the degradation advantage they have right now.zibby43 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 02:44Pretty optimistic outlook for Merc, as outlined by Scarbs:
https://youtu.be/2Rcj2x5tpu8
100% agreed. In terms of overall team performance, Bottas needs to get comfortable with the car. As Scarbs said, Hamilton is able to extract the performance out of it despite it being a bit on a knife's edge like the '18 car.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 06:31I think the biggest step they will take, will be being able to switch on the softer compounds without sacrificing the degradation advantage they have right now.zibby43 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 02:44Pretty optimistic outlook for Merc, as outlined by Scarbs:
https://youtu.be/2Rcj2x5tpu8
I believe he meant 2017. I don't remember anything being wrong with 2018 car. That one took pole in melbourne with 7 tenths margin.zibby43 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 09:06100% agreed. In terms of overall team performance, Bottas needs to get comfortable with the car. As Scarbs said, Hamilton is able to extract the performance out of it despite it being a bit on a knife's edge like the '18 car.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 06:31I think the biggest step they will take, will be being able to switch on the softer compounds without sacrificing the degradation advantage they have right now.zibby43 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 02:44Pretty optimistic outlook for Merc, as outlined by Scarbs:
https://youtu.be/2Rcj2x5tpu8
Also saw where Horner said, via The Race, that he expects Portimao to play to Merc's strengths. I agree with his assessment, but it still should be pretty close in quali.
Yeah, he wasn't sure himself "was it the 2018 diva they had?". The 2017 car was the one the team referred to as a diva.Juzh wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 10:00I believe he meant 2017. I don't remember anything being wrong with 2018 car. That one took pole in melbourne with 7 tenths margin.zibby43 wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 09:06100% agreed. In terms of overall team performance, Bottas needs to get comfortable with the car. As Scarbs said, Hamilton is able to extract the performance out of it despite it being a bit on a knife's edge like the '18 car.
Also saw where Horner said, via The Race, that he expects Portimao to play to Merc's strengths. I agree with his assessment, but it still should be pretty close in quali.