SmallSoldier wrote: ↑18 Jun 2021, 22:25
They consider fuel / engine mode / amount of laps on the tires for their calculations… Of course it could be way off, but I believe Lando for example had his fastest lap in his 5th lap of his soft tire run… The Mercedes cars were also on what is now the “Friday” engines compared to the Honda cars and Renault who were in fresh engines (and probably higher engine modes to ensure there aren’t any issues with the new units).
But, sometimes (most often than not) their analysis is a little off, so I would take it with a grain of salt… Nevertheless, I do hope that is close to reality this time!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yea they use that AWS stuff....
They were right in Imola when they said Norris would challenge for P3/4 (I can’t quite remember the exact position) and he did until he got his laptime deleted.
Thing is if you read what is written in the article it doesn’t correspond to the graphs.... so they loose creditability....
for example:
‘In qualifying trim, McLaren have a 0.18s advantage over Alpine. When it comes to race simulations, Alpine close the gap to McLaren to 0.02s. A tight fight, then, for best of the rest.’
The quali and race pace figures have swapped in the text to what is shown in the graphs so to me it’s screaming if they can’t write the article correctly what else have they done wrong within the article and formulating the graphs....?