Yes they are correct.
It’s probably being evaluated for use in Spa and Monza?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑02 Jul 2021, 02:18
Unexpected slim rear wing! They can trim so mouch rear downforce and still keep balance for the already little downforce they have?
Sticky uppy bits!!!Mr Brooksy wrote: ↑10 Oct 2021, 08:21For those who enjoy the technical side of F1, some of the areo component descriptions are cringe worthy, but hey. I'll take a positive piece about Williams any day!
Had a skim on mobile, looks good!!! Congrats!DP_CFD wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 14:01So I finally finished my CFD on the Williams models, kind of... This is the 1st part of likely 3, covering the CFD methodology I've used on the car. It's a longer read, but I think you all will enjoy it!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/simulati ... vid-penner
Thank you!jjn9128 wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 15:54Had a skim on mobile, looks good!!! Congrats!DP_CFD wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 14:01So I finally finished my CFD on the Williams models, kind of... This is the 1st part of likely 3, covering the CFD methodology I've used on the car. It's a longer read, but I think you all will enjoy it!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/simulati ... vid-penner
I think that the core here is "all models are wrong..." I find this also while I was working my PhD in Agro-economy.DP_CFD wrote: ↑05 Nov 2021, 14:01So I finally finished my CFD on the Williams models, kind of... This is the 1st part of likely 3, covering the CFD methodology I've used on the car. It's a longer read, but I think you all will enjoy it!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/simulati ... vid-penner