Tom Coronel [ WTCR driver] spoke to Verstappen after crash: "It's not normal how strong he is in his head"
"I have been in contact with both Jos and Max and the response was just very professional.
It was so good that I thought: 'You are not strong in your head, but über strong'. Not normal.
I expected him to grumble a little bit, but being to me as a driver he did the exact opposite:
[Max:] "No problem man, it'll be fine," the WTCR driver told Motorsport.com.
Tom Coronel was therefore even somewhat surprised by the reaction of Verstappen, for whom he has a lot of respect.
“He was very down to earth.
[Max:] "Haha, he [Lewis] is under pressure and next time I'll get him." No grumbling, no whining, nothing at all. This guy's confidence is also his skill. That makes it tough and I think that's what's great about the entire training and way of thinking of Max and Jos. "We speak in performance, goodbye"."
That has warmed the cockles of my heart Wouter. Thank you for posting.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 12:29https://nl.motorsport.com/f1/video/vide ... el/499106/
Tom Coronel [ WTCR driver] spoke to Verstappen after crash: "It's not normal how strong he is in his head"
"I have been in contact with both Jos and Max and the response was just very professional.
It was so good that I thought: 'You are not strong in your head, but über strong'. Not normal.
I expected him to grumble a little bit, but being to me as a driver he did the exact opposite:
[Max:] "No problem man, it'll be fine," the WTCR driver told Motorsport.com.
Tom Coronel was therefore even somewhat surprised by the reaction of Verstappen, for whom he has a lot of respect.
“He was very down to earth.
[Max:] "Haha, he [Lewis] is under pressure and next time I'll get him." No grumbling, no whining, nothing at all. This guy's confidence is also his skill. That makes it tough and I think that's what's great about the entire training and way of thinking of Max and Jos. "We speak in performance, goodbye"."
.Slo Poke wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 13:23.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 12:29https://nl.motorsport.com/f1/video/vide ... el/499106/
Tom Coronel [ WTCR driver] spoke to Verstappen after crash: "It's not normal how strong he is in his head"
"I have been in contact with both Jos and Max and the response was just very professional.
It was so good that I thought: 'You are not strong in your head, but über strong'. Not normal.
I expected him to grumble a little bit, but being to me as a driver he did the exact opposite:
[Max:] "No problem man, it'll be fine," the WTCR driver told Motorsport.com.
Tom Coronel was therefore even somewhat surprised by the reaction of Verstappen, for whom he has a lot of respect.
“He was very down to earth.
[Max:] "Haha, he [Lewis] is under pressure and next time I'll get him." No grumbling, no whining, nothing at all. This guy's confidence is also his skill. That makes it tough and I think that's what's great about the entire training and way of thinking of Max and Jos. "We speak in performance, goodbye"."
That has warmed the cockles of my heart Wouter. Thank you for posting.
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!Slo Poke wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 13:23That has warmed the cockles of my heart Wouter. Thank you for posting.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 12:29https://nl.motorsport.com/f1/video/vide ... el/499106/
Tom Coronel [ WTCR driver] spoke to Verstappen after crash: "It's not normal how strong he is in his head"
"I have been in contact with both Jos and Max and the response was just very professional.
It was so good that I thought: 'You are not strong in your head, but über strong'. Not normal.
I expected him to grumble a little bit, but being to me as a driver he did the exact opposite:
[Max:] "No problem man, it'll be fine," the WTCR driver told Motorsport.com.
Tom Coronel was therefore even somewhat surprised by the reaction of Verstappen, for whom he has a lot of respect.
“He was very down to earth.
[Max:] "Haha, he [Lewis] is under pressure and next time I'll get him." No grumbling, no whining, nothing at all. This guy's confidence is also his skill. That makes it tough and I think that's what's great about the entire training and way of thinking of Max and Jos. "We speak in performance, goodbye"."
Max has had 51G on his head and neck, among other things.godlameroso wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:05
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!
If you are that traumatised by it, you should read this.Ryar wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:44Insensitivity about Max's health due to the immense impact of the incident on the race thread is mind boggling. It's nauseating and makes me wonder for the kind of human beings they are. I just hope there are no internal injuries and he will be the force that he is. Hope he can come back and crush it like in the past few races.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:18Max has had 51G on his head and neck, among other things.godlameroso wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:05
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!
He has had all kinds of scans and everything appears to be fine at the moment.
However, such a blow often produces neurological complaints after months.
So it remains to be seen what damage this crash has caused.
Agree 100%. In some accident in the road, the body is ok...otuside, as the modern cars ar very safe. But the organs in the body cannot endure the sudden deceleration. 51G is brutal force, and seeing that the pilot step out and seems "live" is ok, but it can have long effect and anything can happen in following days after the accident.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:18Max has had 51G on his head and neck, among other things.godlameroso wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:05
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!
He has had all kinds of scans and everything appears to be fine at the moment.
However, such a blow often produces neurological complaints after months.
So it remains to be seen what damage this crash has caused.
No he hasnt.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:18Max has had 51G on his head and neck, among other things.godlameroso wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:05
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!
Right. Max was in the air, levitating inside the cockpit when the car hit the barrier.LaplacesDemon wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 00:22No he hasnt.Wouter wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:18Max has had 51G on his head and neck, among other things.godlameroso wrote: ↑22 Jul 2021, 15:05
Same, that was my biggest fear, but if he already shook it off, game on. Lets goooooo!
The survival cell has, not the driver.
Ryar wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 05:16Right. Max was in the air, levitating inside the cockpit when the car hit the barrier.
Note it says in-car, not in Max.In-car sensors estimated that the impact registered at 51G, which was the biggest crash of Verstappen's career.
There are no "in driver" sensors for g-force measurement in f1 so far. That is just basic common sense. As a general measure, the impact measured from "in car" sensors are considered to be the impact the driver experiences too. The mechanisms put in place in a car, are to avoid all kinds of post impact physical injuries. That doesn't mean the driver didn't had the impact of g-force. Stop trivilializing it to prove a moot point.dans79 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:27
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda ... -/6633616/Note it says in-car, not in Max.In-car sensors estimated that the impact registered at 51G, which was the biggest crash of Verstappen's career.
Max didn't experience 51G, unless you have proof that he had a G sensor on/in him.
The entire point of the side impact structures, the foam around the cockpit, and even the foam in his helmut is to reduce the load Max experiences.
An analysis of maximum vehicle G forces and brain injury in motorsports crashes.
Results: We analyzed 374 crashes. A driver in a crash with an impact of > or =50 G developed a head injury 16.0% (30/188) versus 1.6% (3/186) in those of <50 G (P < 0.001). The mean peak G for those with head injury was 79.6 (SD 28.5) versus 50.6 (SD 28.0) in those with no head injury (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Findings were that IRL car crashes with peak vehicle G > or = 50 were associated with the development of traumatic brain injuries.
That study was done using ancient data when it comes to safety.Ryar wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:43https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16531891/dans79 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:27
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda ... -/6633616/Note it says in-car, not in Max.In-car sensors estimated that the impact registered at 51G, which was the biggest crash of Verstappen's career.
Max didn't experience 51G, unless you have proof that he had a G sensor on/in him.
The entire point of the side impact structures, the foam around the cockpit, and even the foam in his helmut is to reduce the load Max experiences.An analysis of maximum vehicle G forces and brain injury in motorsports crashes.
Results: We analyzed 374 crashes. A driver in a crash with an impact of > or =50 G developed a head injury 16.0% (30/188) versus 1.6% (3/186) in those of <50 G (P < 0.001). The mean peak G for those with head injury was 79.6 (SD 28.5) versus 50.6 (SD 28.0) in those with no head injury (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Findings were that IRL car crashes with peak vehicle G > or = 50 were associated with the development of traumatic brain injuries.
For example Formula1 didn't even mandate a hans devise till 2003!We analyzed data regarding Indy Racing League (IRL) car crashes from 1996 to 2003 and compared the likelihood of head injury in those drivers who were in a vehicle that sustained an impact of ≥50 G versus those with a lesser impact. The mean maximal G for those with head injury was compared with those without head injury.
I take it that you are implying there are no possibilities of any sort of internal injuries to a driver in modern day sports cars and that there are zero chances of long term impacts to brain, that are not apparent in the immediate aftermath. I don't see any other point of an adamant argument on this. While the point that i have, is a genuine concern for a driver experiencing such a massive crash.dans79 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:56That study was done using ancient data when it comes to safety.Ryar wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:43https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16531891/dans79 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021, 06:27
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda ... -/6633616/
Note it says in-car, not in Max.
Max didn't experience 51G, unless you have proof that he had a G sensor on/in him.
The entire point of the side impact structures, the foam around the cockpit, and even the foam in his helmut is to reduce the load Max experiences.An analysis of maximum vehicle G forces and brain injury in motorsports crashes.
Results: We analyzed 374 crashes. A driver in a crash with an impact of > or =50 G developed a head injury 16.0% (30/188) versus 1.6% (3/186) in those of <50 G (P < 0.001). The mean peak G for those with head injury was 79.6 (SD 28.5) versus 50.6 (SD 28.0) in those with no head injury (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Findings were that IRL car crashes with peak vehicle G > or = 50 were associated with the development of traumatic brain injuries.
For example Formula1 didn't even mandate a hans devise till 2003!We analyzed data regarding Indy Racing League (IRL) car crashes from 1996 to 2003 and compared the likelihood of head injury in those drivers who were in a vehicle that sustained an impact of ≥50 G versus those with a lesser impact. The mean maximal G for those with head injury was compared with those without head injury.