That's an interesting point. The would confirm the apparent spirit of the financial regulations in that they don't really control cashflow and prevent teams from folding but really control the ability of big teams to do excessive research and development on aero and the like, whilst the smaller teams either suffer to keep up or overshoot their budgets to keep up. This is not surprising, as F1 has not even come close to having a new entrant due to the large financial risk that remains despite the potential equality of performance going forwards.Jolle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2021, 19:20About the power units. HPP operations don’t account towards the cap, just their invoice for the power units to the team, which has to be a fair price. Income from for instance Williams or McLaren have no influence on the cap of Mercedes, just a good financial result for HPP.
Mercedes can of course give a discount to Williams for their PU but, the fair price will count towards the cost cap, even if the real cost is only half.
The silly season is now well and truly underway.
It’s never intended as a way to prevent bankruptcy of teams. It’s pure a way to limit the investment needed to run a competitive team.politburo wrote: ↑01 Sep 2021, 19:43That's an interesting point. The would confirm the apparent spirit of the financial regulations in that they don't really control cashflow and prevent teams from folding but really control the ability of big teams to do excessive research and development on aero and the like, whilst the smaller teams either suffer to keep up or overshoot their budgets to keep up. This is not surprising, as F1 has not even come close to having a new entrant due to the large financial risk that remains despite the potential equality of performance going forwards.Jolle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2021, 19:20About the power units. HPP operations don’t account towards the cap, just their invoice for the power units to the team, which has to be a fair price. Income from for instance Williams or McLaren have no influence on the cap of Mercedes, just a good financial result for HPP.
Mercedes can of course give a discount to Williams for their PU but, the fair price will count towards the cost cap, even if the real cost is only half.
He was a bit like Max but 20 years ago. Didn't have a long single seater career but was obviously very quick. Once he got in to a top car, he was often quick enough to make the established stars look over their shoulders. 2 second places in the title race early in his career. Then his single title. And 3 third places - one of them in a Lotus!
'twas a matter of time.
Read this imaginary quote in Kimi's voice:
You sir, are most correct. Although it is also true that he did not out race him in Austria lolFulcrum wrote: ↑31 Aug 2021, 15:21Austria? Don't you mean Hungary?adrianjordan wrote: ↑30 Aug 2021, 09:25He earned that second place by qualifying 2nd.
Latiffi did not out race Russell in Austria. He was lucky as the start to end up where he did and then Russell got screwed at the restart by where his pit box was. Put this another way, discounting the pit lane mix up, Lattifi lost more places than George did during the race.
By your logic Latiffi is a better driver than Verstappen, Ricciardo and Raikonnen, because he beat him too despite being in a Williams. Wow, this Latiffi, must be the next Senna!!
Come on. No-one serious actually believes Latiffi is better than Russell, or has out raced him.
classic!adrianjordan wrote: ↑02 Sep 2021, 00:31Read this imaginary quote in Kimi's voice:
"Yeah I like the endurance racing it's very good the car is fast and I don't get wet when it rains you know and then I get out the car and someone else drives and I can have an ice cream and take a --- and then I get back in the car and drive fast it's really good."