Bracken wrote: ↑25 Nov 2024, 22:53
Yeah I saw that so Sainz pitted first, Leclerc a few laps later yet still came out ahead of Sainz after he boxed but was on cold tyres and Sainz passed him again? So, why didn't Leclerc then pass Sainz if he was so much faster? I think he is being a bit selfish for moaning about all this.
Part of this issue lies with the race engineers, who gave Sainz and Leclerc different instructions. Leclerc was told that "Sainz will not overtake you," only for Sainz to do so a second later. Sainz was not actually told to not overtake Leclerc, but rather that he shouldn't put pressure on him, which he didn't.
Had Bozzi communicated the latter message to Leclerc, I doubt Leclerc would've been as upset. Wording matters.
Additionally, Leclerc was probably upset that Sainz didn't willingly move out of the way in the second stint as he did for Sainz in the first stint.
In my opinion, it was more of a misunderstanding caused by the team. The whole situation would not have happened had they pit Sainz when he asked. In fact, they left both Leclerc and Sainz out on cold tires despite the drivers pretty much begging to come in. They had really poor communication this race. I'm annoyed that this whole Leclerc/Sainz thing is taking attention away from the fact the team messed up here more than either driver. More scrutiny should be on the race engineers and pit wall for their differing instructions and terrible pit strategy.
However, you are of course entitled to your own view. I highly doubt anything will come out of this. It was a single frustrated radio where Leclerc didn't even have all the information at hand. In the past, Leclerc and Sainz have never really carried grudges against each other across multiple races.