If you only focus on Ferrari, then it is true. Charles lost: certain wins at Spain (reliability) and Monaco (strategy) + potential wins at Baku (reliability), France (driver error) and Hungary (strategy) which if you add them up - and exclude inherited points from Max - would mean a substantial lead.Juzh wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 13:21There's no chance Leclerc has a substantial lead even if you remove all misfortune for both drivers. Verstappen had an 80 point lead over Leclerc after Hungary. Verstappen also had 2 mechanical DNFs in first 3 races. At best Leclerc is a lot closer, but substantial lead? No way.Sphere3758 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 16:13This.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 16:01
I’d argye that Ferrari did keep up with development in 2022. There is just nothing they could do about their entire car concept being destroyed with a mid-season TD.
Up until Spa 2022 they were easily on par with Red Bull. It’s only after TD39 that their car turned into a tyre destroyer that couldn’t keep up. The narrative that Ferrari was getting out-developed before then is a false one caused by tye points tally shifting in favour of Red Bull. But that was really only down to strategy and reliability blunders.
Ferrari just went on a mad spree from Spain to Hungary 2022 screwing Leclerc over so much that the true performance of the car was never fairly evaluated. There is a good chance Leclerc would have had a substantial lead over Max before TD39, luck neutralized on both sides
BUT as you rightly say, Max lost a couple of second places early on to reliability too, so it’s cherry picking a bit to only have Ferrari fix their problems but not RB.
At the end of the day, this is all in the past, so not a lot of point worrying about it now. The TD hurt Ferrari massively, of that there is no doubt, but we can focus on the future now.

