I can already see it...Powershift wrote:Hopefully we get to see Kimi and Alonso go at it full tilt
If you take an f1 car apart into 15 000 parts, each part will on average weigh something like 42 grams. However, this is including all the ballast, and there is a minimum weight on the engine, so in reality, each part will on average have a weight considerably smaller than 40 grams. Then 1 gram is suddenly a very large proportion. I don't know how much ballast they use in today's cars, but I have heard numbers close to 100 kg before. In addition, the engine must weigh a minimum of 95 kg. So if we subtract this, let's say we are left with 450 kg. Then 15 kg is 3.33% and I strongly doubt that the machining tolerances and material deviation is anywhere near that in terms of weight.Powershift wrote:I have heard it said that there are over 15,000 individual parts that make up a F1 car, can you imagine that each individual part is weighed and inspected and that if a part is even 1 gram lighter than it goes to the preferred driver, that alone would be 15kg of ballast moved to a performance enhancing position, not to mention stronger engines(1% stronger can be 7hp) plus the all important preferred pit strategies... life as a number 2 driver is a huge uphill battle, and a strong psychological battle as well.
This is very hard for me to understand. Why wouldn't Massa be a worthy champion in 2008 (except for the single point he was missing)? I can't think of anyone more worthy. Massa made a mistake in Malaysia, but apart from that he was very consistent and stable and did take the most victories that year. Hamilton, on the other hand, who ended up with the title, had been making mistakes and wasting points all season, including the final race, when Vettel passed him on track when his championship was threatened. Hamilton didn't suffer any car- or team problems, while Massa lost two race victories in Hungary and in Singapore because of the car and the team. I have always felt that both championships went the wrong way that year. Ferrari made many silly mistakes, including the Singapore pit stop blunder, but won the constructur's title. Hamilton made several mistakes as well, including running into Raikkonen in the pitlane in Canada, but won the driver's title. Massa and McLaren were almost flawless and deserved the titles more in my opinion.He would not have been the rightful WDC in 2008, but he put up a great fight, and was at least paid back the home win in Brazil from Kimi moving over.
Rubens wasn't really a team player in my opinion. He had to be forced to do the right thing by his team and then he clearly showed his dissatisfaction, even though his historic results left no doubt that he wasn't the team's title candidate. When Massa had to give Alonso the victory in Germany in 2010, it was the 5th time in 11 races that he was about to beat Alonso. That is excluding the chinese grand prix, where Massa was ahead in the pitlane entry, when Alonso overtook him off-track. Even if one considers that a legitimate move, it is clear that Massa og and Alonso were quite evenly matched until this team order and there was no constant moving over from Massa befor this. Later there has been a lot of moving over and that is not something I will expect from Kimi, unless in a situation at the end of the season when the championship is even.But in the end playing "the good team player" ultimately put an end to his F1 career, even more so than Rubens' spring.
Hopefully we get to see Kimi and Alonso go at it full tilt, that will be so much more enjoyable than Massa's constant moving over.
There is also the weight of 4 tires.Stradivarius wrote: ....However, this is including all the ballast, and there is a minimum weight on the engine, so in reality, each part will on average have a weight considerably smaller than 40 grams. Then 1 gram is suddenly a very large proportion. I don't know how much ballast they use in today's cars, but I have heard numbers close to 100 kg before. In addition, the engine must weigh a minimum of 95 kg. So if we subtract this, let's say we are left with 450 kg. Then 15 kg is 3.33% and I strongly doubt that the machining tolerances and material deviation is anywhere near that in terms of weight.
Massa inheriting the Spa win after Hamilton received a penalty, earned him 2 points, while Hamilton lost 4 points. When Massa's engine blew up in Hungary, he lost 10 points, while Hamilton gained 1 point. In Singapore Massa lost another 2 points, while Hamilton gained another point.ChrisF1 wrote:Just ignoring things like Massa inheriting the Spa win after Hamilton received a ridiculous penalty then?
(This came the race after Massa should have been given a penalty for unsafe release in the pits)
I agree that both could have deserved the title, I was just responding to Powershift's claim that Massa wouldn't have been the rightful champion. By the way, the teammates from Finland made little difference either way. If we ignore the fight for victory between Kimi and Massa in Malaysia, where Massa ran off the track and lost 8 points, Kimi only took 3 points away from Massa and 5 points away from Hamilton, so Massa gained a net 2 points. Kovalainen took 1 point away from Massa and 3 points away from Hamilton, so there Massa gained another 2 points. But these 4 points and the 6 points from Spa don't out-weigh the 22 points Massa lost in Hungary and Singapore. And you could also say that because Hamilton wasn't threatened by his team mate, he took easy victories in the races where McLaren had the quickest car. In Malaysia, where Ferrari had the quickest car, Massa had to fight his team mate this time he cracked under the pressure and went off the track. Had his team mate been a weaker driver, Massa would have taken an easy 10 points in Malaysia, as Hamilton did in Australia.I think if the 2008 title had gone either way then it would have been deserved, but Massa benefitted more from Kimi's help than Lewis did from Heikki.
I don't mean to be negative, but Massa was nowhere near Schumacher in 2006. His results look better because the competition behind Ferrari and Renault was much weaker than the competition has been during the past years. Ferrari even adapted their strategies in 2006 to help Massa beat Alonso, because 2 points per race wasn't enough for them after falling behind in the beginning of the seson.antiuser wrote:If one looks at the stats, you can see that Massa was, until Alonso came along, at least quite competitive if not better than his teammates.
Felipe Massa vs. Michael Schumacher (2006)
Races: 18
Wins: 2 / 7
Qualifying: 5 / 13
Race results: 5 / 12 (both retired at Australia)
Poles: 3 / 4
Fastest laps: 2 / 7
Podiums: 7 / 12
Points: 80 / 121
I don't think anyone would dispute that in terms of sheer performance, Massa was behind. Schumacher had 10 years of Ferrari behind him and 5 WDCs with the team, while Massa was a just test driver who showed promise at Sauber. The point is, he did a good job and performed well within, if not exceeding, what was expected of him in his first year at Ferrari. And then when he became the tenured Ferrari driver as Schumacher exited and Kimi joined, he showed that he could compete on the same level. I'm not saying Massa is a better driver than Schumacher or Alonso, but I do believe he's marginally better than Hulkenberg and miles ahead of Maldonado. Whether a new team will give him the confidence he had pre-accident and pre-Alonso, only time will tell. But I think he deserves another crack at it.Stradivarius wrote:I don't mean to be negative, but Massa was nowhere near Schumacher in 2006. His results look better because the competition behind Ferrari and Renault was much weaker than the competition has been during the past years. Ferrari even adapted their strategies in 2006 to help Massa beat Alonso, because 2 points per race wasn't enough for them after falling behind in the beginning of the seson.