And that's an issue that bothers me. Ferrari, as a team is a large number of hard-working, dedicated craftsmen who pour their heart and soul into the race car. We as fans see only the tip of the tip of the iceberg on race weekend. For every guy we see in the pits on race day, there's over a hundred blokes back in the factory supporting the effort. (same applies to all teams)jddh1 wrote:To all of those that say that the FIA is pro-Ferrari:
They changed the freaking rules (point scoring system) because they were tired of Ferrari winning too much. Now, I have no problem with dynasties be it Ferrari, which I am a fan, or Williams for instance back in the 90s. But it's quite insane I think to believe that these past two years the FIA have been pro-Ferrari when in the past they have shown not to be. I think the FIA needs a change. I say let them race. But that's just my opinion.
And this rule(s) inconsistency swings both ways. There have been decisions that have favored Ferrari, and other decisions that set them back. Back in 1997 after the Jerez race, Schumacher was totally stripped of all points... very, very harsh, even considering the circumstances and actions of Michael.
All drivers try their very best within the framework of the rules, they just sometimes screw up (being human). The pressures are gigantic, and their opponents are crafty, skilled, and courageous.
It pains me to witness such controversies, because it affects everyone. Especially the fans of said team. I commiserate for those fans, because they get caught up in the dirty waste of such decisions. Especially Ferrari, because I believe that although the FIA is sympathetic to them, the race decisions there just to give the red team a boost. It just appears that way. (maybe because Ferrari has such a loud and vocal PR machine...?) The root of the problem is just plain inconsistencies, decisions handed down by a rotating crew that really aren't properly trained for the task.