Effects of a 200 liter fuel-tank?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Effects of a 200 liter fuel-tank?

Post

You guys dont seem to remember the cars back in 1993 had full race tanks, with engines that are probly thirstier than todays.
Image

The distance between the driver's back & the rear wheel centerline will be increased, and therefore the wheelbase, but it wont be a radical change.

The driver sat a bit more upright, but also the feet were lower because the nose was not as high as today's.

Dukeage
Dukeage
0
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 21:28

Re: Effects of a 200 liter fuel-tank?

Post

It looks like a tight fit to get the driver's feet behind the front axle though - when did that rule come in?

Patriiick
Patriiick
0
Joined: 29 Jul 2008, 08:54

Re: Effects of a 200 liter fuel-tank?

Post

i would not be worried about fitting a kers and a 200l tank for several reasons:

- 200l is a very wide measure. With v8s you could look at considerably less (170 ?).
- a good base for comparaison is to take a pre-refueling era car (say 1992) running for instance a v12... this would volumetrically be quite similar to a v8+kers.
a good example hence could be the mp4-7 running a relatively voluminous Honda v12.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... n_Hall.jpg

- Dont forget that by 2010, gen2 Kers will likely be a bit tighter and definitely more interesting.

Granted the regulations would probably push the driver back a bit for crash-test reasons but it really is not that bad. You can have a very tight package, not necessarly a super long wheelbase.

The car shown by isalmatron is the 1993 running a ford V8.. much more compact car overall.. but not THAT different.