Fabrega was right
What a nightmare for Aston
Although the general Idea is right (red bull didn't have their usual advantage, at least over single lap), but this very article represents a great example of very poor quality journalism.Alexf1 wrote: ↑21 Oct 2023, 06:41Nope, but thanks for trying again with a baseless oneliner..PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Oct 2023, 05:42Q3 is what happens when the cars are equal and drivers feel the pressure.
Congrats to Leclerc.
On the other end of that spectrum: https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/mark ... at-austin/
LMAO, this is 'legendary' Mark Hughes. Verstappen overshoot his braking, went too deep, of course he gained a bit on the entry, but lost all of that and more on the exit. It's not Ferrari who were 'significantly faster' down the gill, it was direct consequence of Max mistake in T1 where he lost 0.15 to Charles..Verstappen takes a big chunk of time out of both cars through Turn 1, but thereafter, the Ferrari is significantly faster down the hill and through Turn 2 and along the short straight which follows, travelling around 3km/h faster for a long distance.
Same here. Max just braked quite a bit later than both, gained a lot of time on the entry but lost most of it on the exit, especially compared to Charles. Hitting kerb in T11 didn't affect Charles lap time much. In fact he stepped on the full throttle much earlier than Max and their minimal speed was the same at 79, as opposed to 72 for Norris, who made a mistake indeed(for his car, Ferrari seemed to be better on the kerbs). This is a classic example of different approaches, with very similar final result. Charles made bigger and more obvious mistakes in T12 and also T19, which was his poorest corner(lost 0.18s to his previous run instead of improving on improved track), which should've been an ultimate prove Ferrari were indeed fastest on merit. No single word from Hughes about that. I honestly feel for people who pay for these articles and such 'journalism'. Hughes is good at putting a lot of words together, but very poor in actual analyzing.When looking at a breakdown in how Verstappen’s lap compared to those of the top two on the grid - Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari and Norris’ McLaren - the Red Bull gets its (ultimately deleted) pole almost solely from a huge advantage at the Turn 11 hairpin.
Neither Norris nor Leclerc were clean through there, both taking a little too much apex kerb, caught out by how much more their cars rotated than they were expecting.
only if you can't read the telemetry, then you start wild guessing as you did there, scattering random thoughts around, which is indeed completely pointless waste of bytes.
ringo wrote: ↑21 Oct 2023, 17:09Max seemed under pressure here. Sign of things to come when the cars are more equal.
I think the redbull could have been on pole in the hands of a qualifying specialist like a leclerc or hulkenberg or a truli or russel.
The redbull seemed less dominant here but i would not say the ferrari was head and shoulders the most deserving of pole. It could have gone to mclaren or even Mercedes.
Max's error into T1 made him over drive. Otherwise pole was his.