DiogoBrand wrote:I know it's really really early to say this, since we don't know for sure how good the car will be until qualifying and we don't know who are the responsibles for its performance. But isn't it a good time to let Prodromou go? I mean, he came as a big promise, but ever since he arrived McLaren has only made shitboxes.
I don’t agree with that statement... Last year’s car had an issue in the manufacturing of the car, not in the design... The cars in 2015-2017 seemed to be well balanced/planted cars only limited by the lack of power and reliability from the Honda engine with good performances at circuits that weren’t power sensitive.
This year’s car is a new concept for the team in regards to the aero philosophy (pretty much a completely different car from an aero perspective compared to last year) and not only in regards to the regulations for the front and rear wings, which means that they will have a learning curve when it comes down to what works in the car and what doesn’t or where they need to push development.
Furthermore, Australia is really not a representative track and the car not performing here, doesn’t necessarily mean that it won’t perform in other circuits... If you build a new concept, you aim that concept to be suitable to the most amount of races as possible and maximize it for those and then work yourself into a more “complete” car that can perform in more types of circuits (for example, Mercedes struggling in certain circuits in the past)... With a big bunch of races that require mid to low downforce (at least surpassing the amount of races that require high downforce), it would be sensible for the team to build the car thinking about those races first.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk