If everyone had the same approach as Honda when entering F1 repeatedly, there wouldn't even be a race for the first six months.ispano6 wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 03:09I stopped translating for this forum for several reasons. It took a nose-dive in terms of the quality of the technical talk and became a place for cry babies. Even if I did provide the sites, they would be mistranslated and misinterpretted by the same perpetrators. The fact is, these people jump to conclusions and treat fact from heresay and secondary/tertiary sources. You know the quality of the poster when they accuse Honda of not knowing what they are doing. Why are we allowing such talk on this technical forum?bigblue wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 23:50
Because the important info came out in interviews / press conferences rather than press releases (which is more the style of the team websites), but then you're at the whim of the reporting which sometimes misses the nuances, to the point where what's fact, an informed guss and complete conjecture, is hard to disentangle. Hence if you're really interested you try to look at a whole bunch of sites, take into account their reliability, and skim the forums as well to see what else other people have found (sometimes someone kind who speaks Japanese will translate directly, instead of relying on machine translation, yes ispano6 does this sometimes if there's something particularly worth mentioning).
Anyway, maybe ispano6 could name the main few Japanese f1 sites, and how reliable they are in their opinion? That would be interesting. Probably about as reliable as the non-Japanese ones, but maybe they get the odd bit of info or quotes that aren't seen elsewhere, just wondering.
What's happening is not a coincidence.
