Does the top front wing flap has to be activated fully or just a part of it?
Feels to me, it would be activated from the center not the sides.
Just speculating with my zero knowledge
There is a specific allowance for cooling outlets to not be symmetric.
https://www.fia.com/system/files/docume ... 2-10_0.pdfC3.2.3 ...Minimal exceptions to the requirement of symmetry of this Article will be accepted for the
installation of non-symmetrical mechanical components, for asymmetrical cooling requirements
Its not how far back, its the fore/aft angle of the arms at the end of the day that affects how much of the upward force from movement of the wheels goes into the pushrods vertical movement component (and dampers) versus directly into the chassis.Chuckjr wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 10:52Is it possible (I really don't know, I am asking) that one of the reasons for Newey locating the front wheel suspension arm so far back, is to improve the feel the driver experiences as the mount point is closer to driver center? There have been so many complaints over the years of drivers not feeling the front of the car with these radical arm placement trends, that this is an extreme attempt to overcome that problem while maintaining improved anti-dive? Sort of a two birds with one stone idea. Thought came to me as I was looking at the car.
Second, is the huge side exit/opening sending hot air from the side pods to improve air expansion post the side pod pinch point in front of the rear wheel? Their exits are proximal to each other, and why I ask. I know the air coming out of that opening is not clean, but is there enough heat coming out of that opening to improve expansion at the rear wing?
Hey Chuck, my 2 cents, as someone who has studied aero for two years alone, and a former F1 TV host, the nerd part of the couple (Chuckjr wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 10:52Is it possible (I really don't know, I am asking) that one of the reasons for Newey locating the front wheel suspension arm so far back, is to improve the feel the driver experiences as the mount point is closer to driver center? There have been so many complaints over the years of drivers not feeling the front of the car with these radical arm placement trends, that this is an extreme attempt to overcome that problem while maintaining improved anti-dive? Sort of a two birds with one stone idea. Thought came to me as I was looking at the car.
Second, is the huge side exit/opening sending hot air from the side pods to improve air expansion post the side pod pinch point in front of the rear wheel? Their exits are proximal to each other, and why I ask. I know the air coming out of that opening is not clean, but is there enough heat coming out of that opening to improve expansion at the rear wing?