
Not really. The issue is, that (like Merc) they needed to sacrifice correlation runs. That is what they have now...correlation issues...Chuckjr wrote: ↑28 Apr 2025, 02:58Nailed it.f1isgood wrote: ↑27 Apr 2025, 11:00Red Bull since mid-2021 have had the least tunnel time and CFD runs while McLaren spending a lot of time in midfield with far more resources than Red Bull managed to actually put the pieces together. And for this reason, I still think Red Bull has a better chance of fixing their issues unlike the other two.
redbull will have upgrades in Miami ,i would like to see what yuki long runpace would be .Bahrain the car didnt work and the other two races were not much of a raceispano6 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2025, 01:26I hope you're right, for Yuki's sake. Alpine likely will also be affected, so if Yuki can be in the mix then he can be rear gunner for Max. They couldn't utilize him in Jeddah which could have helped Max. It would be great if RB21 can be dominant like RB19 with some 1-2 finishes. Probably not likely but possibly on some tracks that Yuki is better at. Miami looks like it will be tough, but Imola may look better with the updates.Vettel165 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2025, 16:44Max will dominate the second part of the season. You heard it here first. The updates will work, and the TD will slow down Mclaren and also Mercedes. They will have much more problems with balance and setting up the car. Just my prediction, could be very wrong though, its a feeling I have.
According to autoracerRed Bull is pushing with a package of innovations ready for Imola. It should be worth 2 theoretical tenths but nobody trusts the correlation.
.
Sorry I'd normally provide a link with the quoteWouter wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 13:42.
I only could find this:
https://autoracer.it/it/analisi-red-bul ... oti-e-vivo
Do you have a link? I don't think it is in this article.
Red Bull is pushing with a package of innovations ready for Imola. It should be worth 2 theoretical tenths but nobody trusts the correlation. Engineer Lambiase, between Bahrain and Arabia, as a trusted man of Verstappen has unusually returned to Milton Keynes to personally contribute to some technical discussions, seems to be revealing a profile very similar to Ross Brawn.
.organic wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 13:50.Wouter wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 13:42.
I only could find this:
https://autoracer.it/it/analisi-red-bul ... oti-e-vivo
Do you have a link? I don't think it is in this article.
Sorry I'd normally provide a link with the quote
https://autoracer.it/it/mclaren-red-bul ... rrari-sf25
Red Bull is pushing with a package of innovations ready for Imola. It should be worth 2 theoretical tenths but nobody trusts the correlation. Engineer Lambiase, between Bahrain and Arabia, as a trusted man of Verstappen has unusually returned to Milton Keynes to personally contribute to some technical discussions, seems to be revealing a profile very similar to Ross Brawn.
Marko say the goal is to increase the operation window of car and fix drivebility of the car .the two tenth were do people get that from and how credible is that.Sergej wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 13:33"2 theoretical tenths" --> half tenth on track
of course it will depend on what further improvements these upgrades will bring: if, on top of the 2 tenths, there is an improved tyre wear / car balance / whatever, then the global improvement will be bigger
if, all things considered, the net gain is actually 0.2 then it's not enough, McLaren will upgrade as well, Ferrari gained 1 tenth with Bahrain floor and will upgrade again (supposedly with a larger package than Bahrain), so Red Bull will fall behind again.
Trying to act like the difference to Max never changed from 2022 to late 2023 and 2024 is just absolute willful denial of reality. I feel like making me prove that is an exercise in wasting not just my time, but yours and also of everybody with the misfortune of reading through our posts. smhf1isgood wrote: ↑27 Apr 2025, 11:00Second driver performance relative to Max has been more or less constant. Perez was only marginally worse in 2024 than in 2022 and 2023 but the issues never looked big because Red Bull just had a much bigger margin to the third best team in 2022 than in 2023 in qualifying. The pace advantage in the race also shrunk from 2023 onwards so it was harder to farm DOTD by starting P7 and getting P2 or P3. In fact, I'd argue Perez in 2023 wasn't much worse than Perez in 2022. The gaps just shrunk between cars and more teams were in contention behind VER.
Also, with all due respect to other teams like Ferrari and Mercedes, only Red Bull have won titles this regulation and they will, regardless of McLaren winning both titles this year come out as the most successful team of this cycle. People can have their opinion and always make good arguments that Red Bull fell off while McLaren grew stronger but it's an argument that's easily defended by the simple fact that Red Bull since mid-2021 have had the least tunnel time and CFD runs while McLaren spending a lot of time in midfield with far more resources than Red Bull managed to actually put the pieces together. And for this reason, I still think Red Bull has a better chance of fixing their issues unlike the other two.
It’s on top of the improvements that they have already made in Jeddah and those to be seen in Miami.Sergej wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 13:33"2 theoretical tenths" --> half tenth on track
of course it will depend on what further improvements these upgrades will bring: if, on top of the 2 tenths, there is an improved tyre wear / car balance / whatever, then the global improvement will be bigger
if, all things considered, the net gain is actually 0.2 then it's not enough, McLaren will upgrade as well, Ferrari gained 1 tenth with Bahrain floor and will upgrade again (supposedly with a larger package than Bahrain), so Red Bull will fall behind again.
I think fixing rear tire heating should be the bigger goal. At Bahrain the car was nowhere. No upgrade was going to fix that.